Newbie posts Star Diamond Mach 4 match

This forum is for general discussions and questions, including Collectors Corner and anything to do with Computer chess.

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Steve B, Watchman

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the fen tag before the upgrade.
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Game 5 A very professional effort by M4-33. M4 totally cramps the White position and eventually exploits a TOTALLY open White King for mate.

[Event "SD M4-33 match"]
[Black "M4-33"]
[Date "Mar 13, 2017"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Star Diamond"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.c3 d6 9.h3 h6 10.d4 Re8 11.Nbd2 Bf8 12.Nf1 Bb7 13.Ng3 Na5 14.Bc2 Nc4 15.b3 Nb6 16.dxe5 dxe5 17.Qe2 Qd6 18.Rd1 Qc5 19.Qe3 Nbd7 20.a4 b4 21.c4 Qxe3 22.Bxe3 Nc5 23.Nd2 Rad8 24.Kh1 Rd7 25.a5 Red8 26.Nf3 Bd6 27.Nd2 Ne6 28.Nf3 c5 29.Nd2 Nd4 30.Bb1 Bc6 31.Kg1 Bb8 32.Re1 Bc7 33.Ne2 Nh5 34.Nc1 Ne6 35.Rd1 Nhf4 36.Ra2 f6 37.Kh2 Rd6 38.g3 R6d7 39.Rb2 Nh5 40.Ra2 Ng5 41.Bxg5 fxg5 42.Kg1 Rd6 43.Kg2 Nf6 44.f3 h5 45.Kg1 g4 46.hxg4 hxg4 47.f4 R6d7 48.Kf1 Bxe4 49.Re1 Bxb1 50.Nxb1 exf4 51.gxf4 Bxf4 52.Ne2 Bc7 53.Kg2 Rd3 54.Nc1 Rg3+ 55.Kh1 Rh3+ 56.Kg1 Bf4 57.Rb2 Kf7 58.Ne2 Be3+ 59.Kg2 Rdh8 60. RESIGNS 0-1

C93: Ruy Lopez: Closed in book for 15 full moves. Note: iPad crashed and I was unable to follow game in real time: SD “Restore” feature got me the blow by blow repeat…too bad for SD! SM doesn’t like SD 21. c4? (QxQ says SM) and M4 is up -0.8. Then SM doesn’t like (repetitive) SD 29. Nd2? recommending Ne1; Black up -1.5! I was following blindfolded and could not “see” M4-33 38. .. R6d7, which I thought was a mistake with the Knight “en prise” at f4, but 39. PxN PxP 40. BxP BxB+ (or 40. Kg2 Be5!!) leads to disaster for White. But, M4 “panicked” at 39. .. Nh5? and could have played the stronger 39. .. Bb7 (the Knight still can’t be taken)! Eval drops from -2.2 to -1.4). M4 assertive 40. .. Ng5! “upsets” the SD program and SD calculates a B for Kt trade 41. Bxg5? SM doesn’t like this and gives Black a -2.3 eval advantage!
NOTE: At this point, ALL of Whites 5 pieces are confined to rectangular grid from a1 to d2!! SM also does not like SD 45. Kg1? (Kf2) and the M4 advantage goes to -3!! M4-33 is closing in on a win. And the last straw was SD 47. f4?? GAME OVER. Unfortunately, M4-33 misses the strongest continuation (47. .. Nxe4!), but SD was having a bad day and after 48. Kf1?? it really was GAME OVER, as the eval shoots to -8 !!! By Black move 57, SM has M4-33 up -12.4 and then Star Diamond also catches on at move 60 and “graciously” (thanks D. Kittinger) RESIGNS!! Wow! After losing the first game, the “on steroids” 33 MHz Fidelity MACH 4 storms back with 3 W 1D and leads 3.5-1.5 after 5 games!
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Saturday: A two game post day.

Game 6 Exact copy of Game 4, UNTIL SD 27. .. Qa3. AGAIN, M4-33 totally f#@!s up a decent lead in just a couple of turd moves. And this time SD wins.

[Event "SD mach4-33 match"]
[Black "Star Diamond"]
[Date "Mar 13, 2017"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Round "6"]
[White "Mach4-33"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Bc5 10.Nbd2 O-O 11.Bc2 Nxf2 12.Rxf2 f6 13.Nf1 Bxf2+ 14.Kxf2 fxe5 15.Kg1 Bg4 16.Ne3 Bxf3 17.gxf3 Ne7 18.a4 Rb8 19.axb5 axb5 20.Qd3 g6 21.Ng4 Qd6 22.Bg5 Nf5 23.Qe2 Rbe8 24.Re1 Kg7 25.Kh1 b4 26.Nxe5 bxc3 27.bxc3 Qa3 28.Qd2 Qd6 29.Ng4 Rxe1+ 30.Qxe1 c6 31.Bxf5 Rxf5 32.f4 h5 33.Nh6 Rxf4 34.Qa1 Qb8 35.Qe1 Re4 36.Qf2 Qc7 37.Qf6+ Kh7 38.Qf8 Qg7 39.Qxg7+ Kxg7 40.Kg1 Re2 41.Bf4 Kf6 42.h4 Ke6 43.Ng8 Rc2 44.Bg5 Rxc3 45.Kf2 Rc4 46.Ne7 Kf7 47.Kf3 Rc3+ 48.Kf2 d4 49.Ke2 Rc5 50.Nc8 Ke6 51.Kd3 Rxg5 52.hxg5 h4 53.Na7 Kd5 54.Ke2 h3 55.Kf2 d3 56.Nc8 h2 57.Kg2 d2 58.Kxh2 d1=Q 59.Ne7+ Ke4 60.Kg2 Qg4+ 61.Kf2 Qf3+ 62.Kg1 Qg3+ 63.Kf1 Kf3 64.Nxg6 Qf2# 0-1

From Game 4 Notes:

C82o: Ruy Lopez: Open that went through White move 15 in book. This is the Black B+N trade for R+P on f2, so the eval was equal but the material asymmetric as part of the opening, resulting in a real tactical game. SM does not like SD 16. .. Bxf3 (Be6) and judges White ahead +0.7.

As in the last game, M4 holds a +0.7 lead at move 17, which increases to +1.2 after 18. .. Rb8? (c6). By move 23, M4 has a +1.2 lead, but calculates weaker 23. Qe2 (Re1 is better). Then the variation from Game 4: SD move 27. .. Qa3? (d4 or c6, even SM was having trouble) and M4 is now up a healthy +1.9! But, just as last game, M4 unnecessarily removes the Knight from e5: 29. Ng4? (32.Nf3 in Game 4) and a +1.8 lead drops to +0.9. And, JUST LIKE GAME 4, M4 turds a disaster that totally turns the game around: in this game idiocy 33. Nh6?? This bowel movement is virtually a game over disaster, as the Knight on h6 is trapped; the Knight is essentially DEAD (from a +1.2 lead with 33. Ne5 to -1.7 with 33. Nh6?? WTF is up with NOT putting the Knight on e5??????????? AND THEN SD DOES WHAT IT DID IN GAME 4!!!!!!!!! Reciprocal turd 36. .. Qc7????????????? is a DRAW! M4 finds correct 37. Qf6+!, but unfortunately does NOT find 38. Nf7!! (Nf7!! Qb8 Bh4! (or Be3!!) Rf4 Ng5+ DRAWN). Disappointing: this move should have been a straightforward no-brainer. After 39. Qxg7+????? it is GAME OVER. Now the excrement 33. Nh6?? is clear: SD has R+4P vs. B+N+2P… but the Knight is toast. Star Diamond makes an excellent calculation 51. .. Rxg5!! (sac R for B) and either “d” or “h” pawn must promote. Mate at 64.

Game 7 Star Diamond had an opportunity, but miscalculates a Rook move (23. Rf2?) in a tricky position and by move 31 is toast!!

[Event "SD M4-33 match"]
[Black "M4-33"]
[Date "Mar 13, 2017"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Round "7"]
[White "SD"]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f4 O-O 6.Nf3 c5 7.d5 e6 8.dxe6 Bxe6 9.Bd3 Nc6 10.f5 Bd7 11.O-O Re8 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bh4 g5 14.Be1 g4 15.Nd2 Qb6 16.Qb3 Qxb3 17.Nxb3 Nb4 18.Bb1 Bc6 19.Rf4 Kh8 20.Bh4 Rg8 21.a3 Na6 22.Bc2 Nh5 23.Rf2 g3 24.Rf3 gxh2+ 25.Kxh2 Be5+ 26.Kh1 Rg4 27.Bf2 Rag8 28.Rg1 Nf4 29.Nd5 Bxd5 30.g3 R8g5 31.Rxf4 Bxf4 32.exd5 Bxg3 33.Bxg3 Rxg3 34.Rxg3 Rxg3 35.Nc1 Re3 36.Nd3 Re2 37.Ba4 Rd2 38.Ne1 Rxb2 39.Kg1 Ra2 40.Bd7 Rxa3 41.Bc8 Rc3 42.Bxb7 Nb4 43.Kf2 Rxc4 44.Kf3 Rd4 45.Ke3 Nxd5+ 46.Ke2 c4 47.Nf3 Nc3+ 48.Kf2 Rd1 49.Ba6 d5 50.f6 Ne4+ 51.Ke2 Ra1 52.Bb7 Nxf6 53.Bc6 a5 54.Ne5 0-1

E76r: King’s Indian: Four Pawns in book through White move 11. Queens trade at move 16/17, so I figure a more positional game: wrong. Some non-optimal M4 moves, 19. .. Kh8? (h5), 20. .. Rg8 (maybe h5?) and 22. Nh5? (Nc7) give SD a decent early lead of +1.7. That is, if SD calculates 23. Rxg4. SD calculates 23. Rf2? and: No more lead (+0.4). And M4-33 went on a roll: 23. .. g3!, 25. .. Be5+, 26. .. Rg4! and 27. Rag8. Bearing down on the Star Diamond King on h1 are M4-33: 2 Rooks, 2 Bishops and a Knight; something has to give. SD panics and messes up 29. Nd5? That just loses a Knight, because SD does not recapture, but calculates 30. g3?? GAME OVER. That was quick. When the dust settles, it is move 35 and SD is down the exchange B+N+4P vs. R+N+6P and -5.7 in eval!. That was that. M4-33 has had a terrific start (4W 2L 1D) and leads 4.5-2.5 after 7 games: somewhat unexpected.
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Sunday, two games...

Game 8 The longest book line in my memory: Sicilian Najdorf through White move 20: results in a virtual flat line draw.

[Event "SD Mach4-33 match"]
[Black "SD"]
[Date "Mar 13, 2017"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Mach4-33"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Be7 8.Qf3 Qc7 9.O-O-O Nbd7 10.g4 b5 11.Bxf6 Nxf6 12.g5 Nd7 13.f5 Bxg5+ 14.Kb1 Ne5 15.Qh5 Qe7 16.Nxe6 Bxe6 17.fxe6 g6 18.exf7+ Kxf7 19.Qh3 Kg7 20.Nd5 Qa7 21.Qg3 Bh6 22.Bg2 Rhf8 23.Rhf1 Rxf1 24.Rxf1 Rf8 25.Rxf8 Kxf8 26.a3 Qg1+ 27.Ka2 Bg7 28.Qh3 Qc5 29.Qe6 Qxc2 30.Qxd6+ Kg8 31.Qd8+ Bf8 32.Nf6+ Kg7 33.Nxh7 Qc4+ 34.Kb1 Bxa3 35.Nf6 Qc5 36.Ne8+ Kf7 37.Bf1 Qf2 38.Qd5+ Kxe8 39.Qxe5+ Be7 40.Bd3 Kf7 41.Qc7 Qc5 42.Qf4+ Bf6 43.h3 Ke7 44.Qg3 Qd6 45.Qe3 Bd4 46.Qg5+ Qf6 47.Qc1 Kd7 48.Be2 Kd6 49.Qc8 Ke5 50.Bd3 Qd6 51.Qh8+ Kf4 52.Qh4+ Ke3 53.Bc2 Be5 54.Qe1+ Kf3 55.Qg1 Qd4 56.Bd1+ Kxe4 57.Qg2+ Kf5 58.Bc2+ Kf6 59.Qxg6+ Ke7 60.Qg5+ Bf6 61.Qc1 Kd6 62.Bb3 a5 63.Bc2 a4 64.Ka2 Qc4+ 65.Kb1 Be5 66.Qh6+ Kd5 67.Qf8 Qd4 68.Qd8+ Kc5 69.Qxd4+ Kxd4 70.h4 Bg7 71.Bf5 b4 72.Bd7 a3 73.bxa3 bxa3 74.Ka2 Bf8 75.Kb3 1/2-1/2

B99u: Sicilian: Najdorf in book THROUGH WHITE MOVE 20!!!!!! As I recall, the deepest book line my chess computers have played. SD was in internal book until move 19 (as I recall), but M4-33 was already calculating about the last 3 or 4 moves (update: at move; 14 Game 14)! The very first non-book move was SD calculation 20. .. Qa7? (Qd8 is book) and SD is IMMEDIATELY down +1.5! But, 2 moves later, M4 calculates weak 22. Bg2? (h4! is the SM recommendation) and the eval goes to 0.0! And that was pretty much the game! SD moves 26. .. Qg1+ and 27. .. Bg7? (Kg8) give M4 one more chance (eval +1.2), but 28. Qh3? (Qh4) ends that. From that point on the eval advantage plot was basically FLATLINE. At move 40, material was Q+B+3P on both sides and it was a 100% draw, but I let ‘em play. SD 67. .. Qd4 threatens mate, so M4 must trade Queens with 68. Qd8+. At move 75, I had had enough, as a B+P vs. B+P draw was a certainty: the two morons would have played another 50 moves to do the same!
After 8 games, M4-33 has reached 5 wins and will at least draw the first section of 10 games. The elo calculator says that M4-33 is playing 89 points higher than Star Diamond!

Game 9 Repeat of Premier Game 7 “Larsen” for 36 full moves (DRAW). Variation by SD now wins. Wrong King move by M4-33 throws away draw in this one.

[Event "SD Mach4-33 match"]
[Black "Mach4-33"]
[Date "Mar 14, 2017"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Round "9"]
[White "SD"]

1.b3 e5 2.Bb2 Nc6 3.e3 d5 4.Bb5 Bd6 5.Nf3 f6 6.c4 a6 7.cxd5 axb5 8.dxc6 bxc6 9.Qc2 Ne7 10.Nc3 f5 11.Ne2 e4 12.Nfd4 Ra6 13.g4 fxg4 14.Qxe4 Bb4 15.a3 Bxd2+ 16.Kxd2 c5 17.Ke1 cxd4 18.Qxd4 Qxd4 19.Nxd4 Bd7 20.Rc1 c6 21.Rg1 O-O 22.Ke2 Raa8 23.h3 b4 24.a4 gxh3 25.Nxc6 Ng6 26.Ne7+ Kf7 27.Nxg6 hxg6 28.Rc7 Rfd8 29.Rd1 Ke6 30.Kf3 Ra5 31.Bxg7 Rh5 32.e4 h2 33.Rh1 Rh7 34.Ba1 Rh3+ 35.Kg2 Rxb3 36.Kxh2 Bxa4 37.Kg2 Rd7 38.Rc8 Kf7 39.Rh7+ Ke6 40.Re8+ Kd6 41.Rh6 Kc5 42.Rc8+ Kb5 43.Rxg6 Ra3 44.Rg5+ Ka6 45.Be5 Ra2 46.Ra8+ Kb5 47.Bf6+ Kc6 48.Rga5 Rdd2 49.Rxa4 Rxf2+ 50.Kg3 Rg2+ 51.Kf4 Rgf2+ 52.Ke3 Rfe2+ 53.Kd4 b3 54.Rxa2 bxa2 55.e5 Kb7 56.Ra3 Kc6 57.Kc4 Rf2 58.Ra5 Kb6 59.Bd8+ Kc6 60.e6 Re2 61.e7 Kd7 62.Kb3 Ke8 63.Rxa2 Re4 64.Ra7 Kf7 65.Kc3 Ke8 66.Kd3 Re6 67.Rc7 Re1 68.Kd4 Rh1 69.Ke5 Re1+ 70.Kd5 Rd1+ 71.Ke4 Rh1 72.Rb7 Kf7 73.Rb3 Ke8 74.Re3 Rh5 75.Rg3 Rh8 76.Kf5 Rh5+ 77.Rg5 Rh8 78.Kf6 Rh6+ 79.Rg6 Rh8 80.Ke6 Rh6 81.Rf6 Rg6 82.Bc7 Rh6 83.Bd6 Rxf6+ 84.Kxf6 Kd7 85.Bf4 Ke8 86.Be3 Kd7 87.Kf7 Kc6 88.e8=Q+ Kc7 89.Ke7 Kb7 90.Qb5+ Kc7 91.Bf4+ Kc8 92.Qa6# 1-0

A01: Nimzowitsch-Larsen: 1. b3 e5 in book through White move 10, the full line in SmallFish. Repeat of Premier Game 7 for 36 full moves. At move 18, Queens trade and the game appears headed for a draw: 2R+B+N+5P on both sides. White wins a pawn at 31. Bxg7, but Black has a dangerous pawn on h3 for compensation. Previously, SD calculates 37. Rb7, but in this game it’s 37. Kg2 (the SM move as well). Still the SM eval has the game a draw (only +0.1) in an even 2R+B+2P endgame. M4 makes a mistake at 38. .. Kf7? (Rf7) and this will lose a pawn at 43. Rxg6. For the next three or four moves, SD harasses the Black King with well-coordinated Rooks and Bishop and by move 47 has a +1.4 lead. But, SD makes a slight mistake itself with 47. Bf6+ (stronger is Rc8) and gives M4-33 an out: 47. .. Kc4 (and probable draw). BUT, then, loser of the game: M4-33 blunder 47. .. Kc6??????? GAME OVER! How M4-33 missed response 48. Rga5 is mind-boggling: THIS MOVE INSTANTLY WINS THE BLACK BISHOP! M4-33 apparently missed skewer move 52. Ra6+, i. e. if Black plays 48. .. Re2, then 49. Rxa4 Rxf2+ 50. Kg3 RxR 51. RxR RxB… but now 52. Ra6+. By move 64, SD had to face a R+B+P vs. R endgame study and initially could not figure it out. SD had the wrong config with Bd8, Pe7 and Rook on the 7th Rank; Rook basically doing nothing, just protecting the pawn. This went on until move 73. Rb3!, when Star Diamond, to its programming credit, calculated that the Rook needs to “get in the game”. M4-33 cleverly tried to sucker SD into a draw with pure Rook sac 80. .. Rh6. SD did not take the bait! SD figured out the second part of the equation, get the Bishop off of d8: 82. Bc7! and 83. Bd6! Now it was Mate in 8. Admirably, SD was able to calculate the necessary “strategy” to force the winning position in this endgame study: I do not believe an Excalibur GrandMaster or GK2000/2100 would have been able to do that: NICE JOB!
Elo changes by -50 for M4-33! Only up 39 now against SD. If M4 loses game 10, it’s dead even.
User avatar
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Re: Newbie posts Star Diamond Mach 4 match

Post by Fernando »

Four.nine wrote:Hello,

My first post. I'm a newbie. Then again, everyone is a newbie, once. I have followed Hiarcs on and off for several years. Good stuff. I have a modest table top chess collection and recently got into playing small tournaments amongst them. I am not a purist. I have no problem with hardware that has been "upgraded" (as opposed to "modified") in a plastic or wooden enclosure. I purchased an upgraded Fidelity Mach4 from...well...someone who is referred to as the "mad modder". I prefer to refer to him as the "excellent upgrader". Excellent upgrader built a 33 MHz Fidelity Mach4 board which I bought and housed in a Designer Display 2000. A Designer Display 2000 plastic housing that now calculates Spracklen computer chess at a Novag Star Diamond level.
There were 20 games at 1 min/move level. Game 1 below. My presentation will be crude (forgive typos), until I get the hang of things. If there is interest, I will present more games, one at a time, so as not to overload. I know the end result...I found the match very entertaining.
Here goes, forgive the crude presentation (cut and paste from a Word doc that has more font "pizazz" then the text shown below. Hope my "notes" are decent"):

Star Diamond-MACH IV 68030 33MHz Match

3/11/17: Decided to play a 20 game match between Novag Star Diamond and Mach4-33 MHz. In the Premier Tourney, Mach4-33 MHz scored 2W 1L 1D Against SD (1 min/move)! (Note M4-50 was 2W 2D!). So, on SSDF, SD is 2186 and a V9 68030 32 MHz is 2162; should be close, let’s see with this match.

Game 1 SD wins in a rout against the 33 MHz MACH4

[Event "SD-M4-33 match"]
[Black "M4-33"]
[Date "Mar 2, 2017"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Star Diamond"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Be7 8.Qf3 Qc7 9.O-O-O Nbd7 10.g4 b5 11.Bxf6 Nxf6 12.g5 Nd7 13.f5 Nc5 14.f6 gxf6 15.gxf6 Bf8 16.Rg1 b4 17.Nce2 Bb7 18.Ng3 d5 19.exd5 Bxd5 20.Qe3 Bxa2 21.Bg2 Rd8 22.Bc6+ Nd7 23.Ngf5 h5 24.h4 Qa5 25.Qg3 e5 26.Rge1 Be6 27.Nxe6 Qa1+ 28.Kd2 Rc8 29.Nfg7+ Bxg7 30.Qxg7 Qxd1+ 31.Rxd1 Rxc6 32.Qxh8+ Nf8 33.Qxf8+ Kd7 34.Qxf7+ Kc8 35.Qe8+ Kb7 36.Nd8+ Kc7 37.Qxc6+ Kxd8 38.Ke3# 1-0

B99y: Sicilian: Najdorf in book for 16 full moves (SD actually started calculating a couple of moves before M4, maybe around move 13 or 14). M4-33 was actually OK for 19 moves and had a slight lead ( 0.8) after SD 20. Qe3? (Nxe6! starts a good attack and SM says +1.6 lead!). But, M4-33 gets greedy 20. .. Bxa2? (Bd6 is safer) and stupid 21. .. Rd8?????? (0-0-0 moron) GAME OVER! SD is up +5! SD misses 24. b3! (24. h4? sucks) and brilliancy 26. Nd6+!! which is Mate in 6!!!!! But, SD DOES find 29. Nfg7+ which is Mate in 9: and that was that. A very bad mistake at move 21 by M4-33 MHz which hands Star Diamond a quick win; wasn’t even close.


PS I have no idea why 0.8 got turned into 0. Smiley sunglasses!

Welcome!!!

I hope someone warned you that the ticket for full incorporation in order to get all the benefices of this place is 500 bucks that you must send to me as the admiral of this place. You will receive in exchange a document giving you credit to be a member here and in time you will get an accolade.
Please a Citibank check

Fern, treasurer, accountant, etc
Festina Lente
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Dear Fernando...treasurer, accountant,

Thank you profusely for getting my mind straight.

I have written out an check for $500 US dollars and have already addressed it in an envelope for deposit to your account. I have included a 20% gratuity.

Please be aware the funds are immediately accessible for your account.

There is only one issue.

There is an unfortunate technical issue that is beyond my control. A temporary hold has been placed on your account by the office of temporary holds, that requires a sign of good faith for release of your funds.

If you were to immediately forward a sign of good faith ...your account can be corrected. Please forward at the earliest possible time a Mephisto 68030 Genius chess computer or TASC R30 v2.23 or Revelation Ii chess computer, to me, and your account will be reinstated in full ...
And your funds will be released.

Please do this quickly, as your temporary hold will expire soon. Do you really want to take this risk of losing your funds? Think about this.

Forward these chess cOmputers quickly before your account becomes dactivated.

4.9

PS. I will take a Millennium geniusexclusive...as a courtesy, to pnly you Fordinodo, in place of the above, but this is my final offer.
User avatar
Dave C
Member
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:50 am
Location: SoCal, US

Riveting Tournament

Post by Dave C »

Hi 49

After a strong leads (3-1 & 4-2-1) SD is making a creditable comeback.

Game on,
Dave
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Game 10 A repeat of M4-50 SD “Premier” Game 102 Old Benoni, but SD won’t cooperate with replay: memorized book fast move entry makes SD vary IMMEDIATELY after book (12. .. Rfc8). In this game M4-33 ALSO wins! Benoni is just bad for SD.

[Event "SD Mach4-33 match"]
[Black "SD"]
[Date "Mar 15, 2017"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Round "10"]
[White "Mach4-33"]

1.d4 c5 2.d5 d6 3.e4 Nf6 4.Nc3 g6 5.Nf3 Bg7 6.Be2 O-O 7.O-O Na6 8.h3 Nc7 9.a4 b6 10.Bf4 Bb7 11.Re1 Qd7 12.Qd2 Rfc8 13.Bh6 e6 14.Bxg7 Kxg7 15.dxe6 fxe6 16.Bd3 Rf8 17.e5 dxe5 18.Nxe5 Qd4 19.a5 Ne4 20.Nxe4 Qxe5 21.b4 cxb4 22.Qxb4 Nd5 23.Qd6 Qf5 24.Qg3 Qf4 25.axb6 axb6 26.Rxa8 Rxa8 27.Nd6 Bc6 28.Rxe6 Qxg3 29.fxg3 Kf8 30.Nc4 Ra1+ 31.Kh2 Ba8 32.Nxb6 Kf7 33.Rd6 Nxb6 34.Rxb6 Bd5 35.c4 Ba8 36.c5 Rc1 37.Ra6 Bd5 38.Ra7+ Kf6 39.Rxh7 Rc3 40.Bb1 Rxc5 41.Ra7 Bf7 42.Ba2 Be8 43.Ra6+ Kg7 44.Re6 Bb5 45.Bb1 g5 46.Rg6+ Kf7 47.g4 Re5 48.Bf5 Re2 49.Kg3 Re3+ 50.Kf2 Re2+ 51.Kf3 Rb2 52.Rxg5 Bf1 53.Rh5 Bxg2+ 54.Kf4 Rf2+ 55.Kg5 Kg8 56.h4 Rf1 57.Rh6 Rd1 58.Rh7 Rc1 59.Rd7 Kf8 60.h5 Bc6 61.Rc7 1-0

From Premier Game 102 Notes:
A43z: Old Benoni: Schmidt in book for 11 full moves. A wild Old Benoni!

*****************************
NOTE: I tried FIVE times to get Star Diamond to repeat Game 102, but at move 12, SD simply would not calculate 12. .. Rab8 of Game 102. This move is calculated immediately after M4-33 INTERNAL book plays instant 12. Qd2. BUT, when I started this game, the very first time SD DID calculate 12. .. Rab8, and repeated GAME 102 to move 14. e5, but the Star Diamond (AND ME) did not register move 14. e5 correctly in this game and after TAKEBACK, SD started calculating as WHITE!!!! Apparently, I did something wrong in the TAKEBACK routine, so I just started the game over (AND FROM MEMORY ENTERED THE ENTIRE OLD BENONI OPENING). As a result, I never got 12. .. Rab8 to repeat in five tries. I theorize that Star Diamond mimics the Excalibur GrandMaster “User Adaptable Time Averaging” Mode (Level 1). I believe with instant Book move entry, the SD records this quicker user move time in some way and “adapts” its own move time to how fast the user is moving pieces (Even during opening book!!!). I am certain this is correct, because during the initial “botched” game, I entered book moves at the typical pace of a typical computer-computer game. But when I tried to replay the game, I remembered this opening, found the moves in Premier Game 102 (M4_50-SD) and eventually memorized the A43z OLD BENONI and virtually entered the moves instantaneously…AND THUS the different SD replay: How do I know? Because in the replays, SD responded with 12. Rab8 in about 5 minutes. But in the original, that move took EIGHT minutes!!!!
Eventually, I said the replay games are just as valid as the original, shrugged my shoulders and went with 12. .. Rfc8. I will try one more time with “typical” computer-computer opening move speed to confirm.
CONFIRMED! 3/15/17: Entered moves in a more typical or deliberate manner and Star Diamond now plays 12. .. Rab8 after calculating for EIGHT MINUTES 15 SECONDS!

So, in this game, with 12. .. Rfc8? (a6) gives M4-33 a quick +0.8 lead. SD move 17. .. dxe5? (Nh5) gives M4-33 a +1.4 lead. Then M4 starts to misstep: 21. b4? (Ng5! ), 23. Qd6? (Qb5 +2.1), 24. Qg3? (a6! +2.7), 25. axb6 (Ng5 +1.6) and 26. Rxa8 (Rb1 +1.2). By move 29, SD was still in the game and only down +0.3 and immediately screws up with 29. .. Kf8? (Nb4): White up + 1.1. And more trouble for SD: 31. .. Ba8? (Nb4) and M4-33 will win a pawn and now is up two pawns. At move 35, material is R+B+4P vs. R+B+2P and M4-33 has a shot to repeat the M4-50 win against this Old Benoni. At move 49, M4 has a choice between pawn push g4 or h4; after looking at both, M4 correctly calculates 47.g4! and a +3.3 lead! This was probably the Game Over point as now M4 will be up THREE pawns. SD picks up a pawn at 53. .. Bxg2+ but the position is already hopeless: by move 59, M4 is up +10 and correctly calculates 59. Rd7! SD resigns at move 61.

Halftime: This match is a slugfest, either win or lose…there were only two draws. M4-33 leads 5W vs. 3W for Star Diamond. However, these two totally distinct programs (Spracklen vs. Kittinger) are probably the closest two machines that I have. Game 4 is typical: “Both M4-33 and SD had possible wins”, however, if you “let ‘em play” long enough, one program will eventually make a winning (OR LOSING) move (only 20% draws). I wouldn’t be surprised to see SD take the last 10 games in the equivalent 6-4 score!
User avatar
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Post by Fernando »

Four.nine wrote:Dear Fernando...treasurer, accountant,

Thank you profusely for getting my mind straight.

I have written out an check for $500 US dollars and have already addressed it in an envelope for deposit to your account. I have included a 20% gratuity.

Please be aware the funds are immediately accessible for your account.

There is only one issue.

There is an unfortunate technical issue that is beyond my control. A temporary hold has been placed on your account by the office of temporary holds, that requires a sign of good faith for release of your funds.

If you were to immediately forward a sign of good faith ...your account can be corrected. Please forward at the earliest possible time a Mephisto 68030 Genius chess computer or TASC R30 v2.23 or Revelation Ii chess computer, to me, and your account will be reinstated in full ...
And your funds will be released.

Please do this quickly, as your temporary hold will expire soon. Do you really want to take this risk of losing your funds? Think about this.

Forward these chess cOmputers quickly before your account becomes dactivated.

4.9

PS. I will take a Millennium geniusexclusive...as a courtesy, to pnly you Fordinodo, in place of the above, but this is my final offer.
all those ,machines are on the way. They were embarked at the Titanic. Un the meantime, send me the check.
Festina Lente
User avatar
Steve B
Site Admin
Posts: 10140
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:02 am
Location: New York City USofA
Contact:

Post by Steve B »

Fernando wrote:
Four.nine wrote:Dear Fernando...treasurer, accountant,

Thank you profusely for getting my mind straight.

I have written out an check for $500 US dollars and have already addressed it in an envelope for deposit to your account. I have included a 20% gratuity.

Please be aware the funds are immediately accessible for your account.

There is only one issue.

There is an unfortunate technical issue that is beyond my control. A temporary hold has been placed on your account by the office of temporary holds, that requires a sign of good faith for release of your funds.

If you were to immediately forward a sign of good faith ...your account can be corrected. Please forward at the earliest possible time a Mephisto 68030 Genius chess computer or TASC R30 v2.23 or Revelation Ii chess computer, to me, and your account will be reinstated in full ...
And your funds will be released.

Please do this quickly, as your temporary hold will expire soon. Do you really want to take this risk of losing your funds? Think about this.

Forward these chess cOmputers quickly before your account becomes dactivated.

4.9

PS. I will take a Millennium geniusexclusive...as a courtesy, to pnly you Fordinodo, in place of the above, but this is my final offer.
all those ,machines are on the way. They were embarked at the Titanic. Un the meantime, send me the check.
Fern
your contest entry is incomplete
read my reply in the contest thread
read you PM's

I am tired of running after you

Exhausted Regards
Steve
User avatar
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Post by Fernando »

Steve B wrote:
Fernando wrote:
Four.nine wrote:Dear Fernando...treasurer, accountant,

Thank you profusely for getting my mind straight.

I have written out an check for $500 US dollars and have already addressed it in an envelope for deposit to your account. I have included a 20% gratuity.

Please be aware the funds are immediately accessible for your account.

There is only one issue.

There is an unfortunate technical issue that is beyond my control. A temporary hold has been placed on your account by the office of temporary holds, that requires a sign of good faith for release of your funds.

If you were to immediately forward a sign of good faith ...your account can be corrected. Please forward at the earliest possible time a Mephisto 68030 Genius chess computer or TASC R30 v2.23 or Revelation Ii chess computer, to me, and your account will be reinstated in full ...
And your funds will be released.

Please do this quickly, as your temporary hold will expire soon. Do you really want to take this risk of losing your funds? Think about this.

Forward these chess cOmputers quickly before your account becomes dactivated.

4.9

PS. I will take a Millennium geniusexclusive...as a courtesy, to pnly you Fordinodo, in place of the above, but this is my final offer.
all those ,machines are on the way. They were embarked at the Titanic. Un the meantime, send me the check.
Fern
your contest entry is incomplete
read my reply in the contest thread
read you PM's

I am tired of running after you

Exhausted Regards
Steve

Sorry, just coming from my work in the coffee where I clean the floor to get a hot meal....already fixed...
Festina Lente
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Dear Fernando,

Great news!!!
The Ministry of Order ...of Magnitudes has now increased your permissable funds to the exciting new value of $5,000!!!!!!
Rarely, do I see such a thing happen. You must be extremely proud!

The Office of Temporary Holds has instructed me to shred that old miniscule $500 check.

Unfortunately, the Ministry of Order has again place a similar, yet different "hold" on this new check. Please be aware that the Office of Temporary Holds has no juristiction in this matter.

The Ministry of Order has informed me to directly deposit these funds into your account, immediately.
Immediately, that is, AFTER I have received all of the dedicated chess computers previously required by the Office of Temporary Holds. My hands are tied here. The Ministry of Order is quite strict along these lines.

Think of all the wonderful adventures you will be exploring with your $5,000.

Now lets get those chess computers shipped via Air Post, so you can lead the life you've simply been dreaming of...Right Now!

Regards,

4.9

Humble servant of several bureaucracies
User avatar
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Post by Fernando »

Four.nine wrote:Dear Fernando,

Great news!!!
The Ministry of Order ...of Magnitudes has now increased your permissable funds to the exciting new value of $5,000!!!!!!
Rarely, do I see such a thing happen. You must be extremely proud!

The Office of Temporary Holds has instructed me to shred that old miniscule $500 check.

Unfortunately, the Ministry of Order has again place a similar, yet different "hold" on this new check. Please be aware that the Office of Temporary Holds has no juristiction in this matter.

The Ministry of Order has informed me to directly deposit these funds into your account, immediately.
Immediately, that is, AFTER I have received all of the dedicated chess computers previously required by the Office of Temporary Holds. My hands are tied here. The Ministry of Order is quite strict along these lines.

Think of all the wonderful adventures you will be exploring with your $5,000.

Now lets get those chess computers shipped via Air Post, so you can lead the life you've simply been dreaming of...Right Now!

Regards,

4.9

Humble servant of several bureaucracies

It looks like I will simply send my Serbian bodyguards to shoot all those bastards and probably you too. After that they will sell your comps and anything you have and give me the proceedings. BUT still you can stop that sadly event just sending me the cost of mobilization of my men, say, 15 grands.
You just have met me today in good humor

bang regards
F
Festina Lente
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Fernando:
I have just been contacted by the Ministry of BBB (Bed, Bath and Beyond).
The BBB has forwarded to you a new broom and urges you to "keep sweeping" and enjoy the hot meals.
You can also enjoy Game 11 on your next break:



Game 11 Draw. SD has a small lead in a Richter-Rauzer, but not enough for a win

[Event "SD Mach4-33 match"]
[Black "Mach4-33"]
[Date "Mar 15, 2017"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Round "11"]
[White "SD"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qd2 a6 8.O-O-O Bd7 9.f4 Be7 10.Nf3 b5 11.Bxf6 gxf6 12.f5 b4 13.Ne2 exf5 14.Ng3 Qa5 15.Qd5 Qxd5 16.exd5 Ne5 17.Rd4 Nxf3 18.gxf3 h5 19.Bd3 h4 20.Nxf5 Bxf5 21.Bxf5 Rh5 22.Bg4 Rg5 23.Rxb4 Rxd5 24.Rb7 Kf8 25.Re1 Re5 26.Kd2 d5 27.f4 Rxe1 28.Kxe1 Bd6 29.Bh5 Re8+ 30.Kf2 Re7 31.Rxe7 Kxe7 32.Ke3 Bc5+ 33.Ke2 Ke6 34.h3 f5 35.Kd3 Bd6 36.Ke3 Bc5+ 37.Ke2 Bd6 38.Kf3 d4 39.c3 dxc3 40.bxc3 Ba3 41.Ke3 Bc1+ 42.Kf3 Bd2 43.c4 Bb4 44.Ke3 Bc5+ 45.Ke2 Bd6 46.Kf3 Bb4 47.Ke2 Bd6 48.Ke3 Bc5+ 49.Kf3 Bb4 1/2-1/2

B69: Sicilian: Richter-Rauzer similar to marathon Game 3, but M4-33 plays 7. .. a6 instead of 7. .. Be7. This game is in book through White move 13, the full line in SM. SM prefers 13. .. a5, and deems Black down +1.0 after M4 calculation 13. .. exf5. SD move 15. Qd5 basically trades Queens and sets the stage for a draw; SM prefers 15. Bc4. SD has another small lead of +1.2 after M4 21. .. Rh5, but again doesn’t get anywhere: after 27. f4, M4 exchanges Rooks and the position is a R+B+5P draw, even though the Black pawn structure is totally ugly. The last two Rooks exchange at move 31 and the position was a 100% draw: B+5P vs. B+5P and Bishops of opposite color. Both programs agreed at move 49. Two very evenly matched chess machines; looking for a 5-5 second half.
User avatar
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Post by Fernando »

Four.nine wrote:Fernando:
I have just been contacted by the Ministry of BBB (Bed, Bath and Beyond).
The BBB has forwarded to you a new broom and urges you to "keep sweeping" and enjoy the hot meals.
You can also enjoy Game 11 on your next break:



Game 11 Draw. SD has a small lead in a Richter-Rauzer, but not enough for a win

[Event "SD Mach4-33 match"]
[Black "Mach4-33"]
[Date "Mar 15, 2017"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Round "11"]
[White "SD"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qd2 a6 8.O-O-O Bd7 9.f4 Be7 10.Nf3 b5 11.Bxf6 gxf6 12.f5 b4 13.Ne2 exf5 14.Ng3 Qa5 15.Qd5 Qxd5 16.exd5 Ne5 17.Rd4 Nxf3 18.gxf3 h5 19.Bd3 h4 20.Nxf5 Bxf5 21.Bxf5 Rh5 22.Bg4 Rg5 23.Rxb4 Rxd5 24.Rb7 Kf8 25.Re1 Re5 26.Kd2 d5 27.f4 Rxe1 28.Kxe1 Bd6 29.Bh5 Re8+ 30.Kf2 Re7 31.Rxe7 Kxe7 32.Ke3 Bc5+ 33.Ke2 Ke6 34.h3 f5 35.Kd3 Bd6 36.Ke3 Bc5+ 37.Ke2 Bd6 38.Kf3 d4 39.c3 dxc3 40.bxc3 Ba3 41.Ke3 Bc1+ 42.Kf3 Bd2 43.c4 Bb4 44.Ke3 Bc5+ 45.Ke2 Bd6 46.Kf3 Bb4 47.Ke2 Bd6 48.Ke3 Bc5+ 49.Kf3 Bb4 1/2-1/2

B69: Sicilian: Richter-Rauzer similar to marathon Game 3, but M4-33 plays 7. .. a6 instead of 7. .. Be7. This game is in book through White move 13, the full line in SM. SM prefers 13. .. a5, and deems Black down +1.0 after M4 calculation 13. .. exf5. SD move 15. Qd5 basically trades Queens and sets the stage for a draw; SM prefers 15. Bc4. SD has another small lead of +1.2 after M4 21. .. Rh5, but again doesn’t get anywhere: after 27. f4, M4 exchanges Rooks and the position is a R+B+5P draw, even though the Black pawn structure is totally ugly. The last two Rooks exchange at move 31 and the position was a 100% draw: B+5P vs. B+5P and Bishops of opposite color. Both programs agreed at move 49. Two very evenly matched chess machines; looking for a 5-5 second half.
Thanks for the broom. Do not forget to pay the bullet to the guy I sent before he use it in your head.
Quid pro quo regards

F
Festina Lente
Four.nine
Full Member
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:30 pm

Post by Four.nine »

Foreward: This game includes a Takeback. Takebacks "wipe" memory (hash tables, stored calculations, whatever you want to call it) and taints (alters) the game; it may or may not change the end result. I do not allow TB and restarted the game...makes for a long game and long documentation. Sorry.

Game 12 SNAFU. Exact copy of Game 6, the third f#@!ing time as White that M4-33 plays a “C82o: Ruy Lopez: Open”. But, I messed up 48. Kf2 and had to do a Takeback. Next move SD calculates TURD 49. .. c5???? (DRAWS) not 49. .. Rc5! which wins in Game 6.

[Event "SD Mach4-33 match"]
[Black "SD"]
[Date "Mar 16, 2017"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Round "12"]
[White "Mach4-33"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Bc5 10.Nbd2 O-O 11.Bc2 Nxf2 12.Rxf2 f6 13.Nf1 Bxf2+ 14.Kxf2 fxe5 15.Kg1 Bg4 16.Ne3 Bxf3 17.gxf3 Ne7 18.a4 Rb8 19.axb5 axb5 20.Qd3 g6 21.Ng4 Qd6 22.Bg5 Nf5 23.Qe2 Rbe8 24.Re1 Kg7 25.Kh1 b4 26.Nxe5 bxc3 27.bxc3 Qa3 28.Qd2 Qd6 29.Ng4 Rxe1+ 30.Qxe1 c6 31.Bxf5 Rxf5 32.f4 h5 33.Nh6 Rxf4 34.Qa1 Qb8 35.Qe1 Re4 36.Qf2 Qc7 37.Qf6+ Kh7 38.Qf8 Qg7 39.Qxg7+ Kxg7 40.Kg1 Re2 41.Bf4 Kf6 42.h4 Ke6 43.Ng8 Rc2 44.Bg5 Rxc3 45.Kf2 Rc4 46.Ne7 Kf7 47.Kf3 Rc3+ 48.Kf2 d4 49.Ke2 c5 50.Nc6 Kg7 51.Ne5 Rh3 52.Nf3 d3+ 53.Kf2 c4 54.Kg2 Rxf3 55.Kxf3 c3 56.Ke3 d2 57.Ke2 Kf7 58.Be3 Ke6 59.Bd4 g5 60.Bxc3 gxh4 61.Bxd2 1/2-1/2

Same EXACT moves as Game 6, except I had to TAKEBACK move 48 on the SD board (I moved Ke2 by mistake; correct was 48. Kf2). That changed the game at SD move 49 (c5? instead of Rc5!) and the result from a win in Game 6 to a draw here in Game 12.
From Game 6 Notes:
Star Diamond makes an excellent calculation 51. .. Rxg5!! (sac R for B) and either “d” or “h” pawn must promote. Mate at 64.
BECAUSE, I erroneously moved 48. Ke2 on the Star Diamond board, I had to do a TAKEBACK at move 48 and the following winning sequence never happened: 48.Kf2 d4 49.Ke2 Rc5 50.Nc8 Ke6 51.Kd3 Rxg5 52.hxg5 h4. This game is recorded as a draw, but I believe SD should have won. Furthermore, the identical opening was played in Game 4 and the result was a draw. I believe THAT game as well is probably a SD win!!!!!
If Moron4-33 MHz plays one more f#@!ing C82o: Ruy Lopez: Open and loses, I am going to change the two draws to wins for SD!!
UPDATE:
Late 3/16/17 I ran a “verification” replay, to see if I can get a repeat of Game 6 (with 49. .. Rc5, not c5 as in Game 14) if I play a straight game with no move entry errors. WELL, WELL, WELL. I got a repeat alright. I emptied both boards of pieces, got a print out of Game 6, and moved pieces as fast as absolutely possible, with the move list in hand. INSTEAD of a repeat of Game 6…the Game ended up a repeat of GAME 4!!!!! At move 27, Star Diamond played 27. .. Re6, as in Game 4…NOT 27. .. Qa3 as in Game 6. And the below move list shows the Verification Game was an exact copy of Game 4 until yet another SD variation, 54. .. Qg6: in Game 4 SD calculated 54. .. h4. So, I thought Game 6 was the paradigm of the C82o: Ruy Lopez: Open if moves are played as fast as possible. Apparently not! Looks like Game 4 is the “standard” for that opening. Game 4 ended in a draw. And the below Round 12 “verification game” was headed for a draw as well. Although the position was tricky for M4-33, when SD varied at move 54, I played 5 more moves and by the last couple of moves SmallFish evaluated the position as 0.0! Therefore: there will be no “changing of two draws to wins for SD”. But, I am “letting” SD keep the win of Game 6.

[Event "SD Mach4-33 match"]
[Black "SD"]
[Date "Mar 12, 2017"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Round "12 verification"]
[White "Mach4-33"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Bc5 10.Nbd2 O-O 11.Bc2 Nxf2 12.Rxf2 f6 13.Nf1 Bxf2+ 14.Kxf2 fxe5 15.Kg1 Bg4 16.Ne3 Bxf3 17.gxf3 Ne7 18.a4 Rb8 19.axb5 axb5 20.Qd3 g6 21.Ng4 Qd6 22.Bg5 Nf5 23.Qe2 Rbe8 24.Re1 Kg7 25.Kh1 b4 26.Nxe5 bxc3 27.bxc3 Re6 28.Bxf5 Rxf5 29.f4 Kg8 30.Qg2 Kg7 31.Rd1 c6 32.Nf3 Re3 33.Qf2 Qe6 34.Re1 Rxe1+ 35.Nxe1 h6 36.Bd8 Qd6 37.Bb6 Rxf4 38.Qg1 Qe6 39.Ng2 Qe4 40.Be3 Rf3 41.Bd4+ Kf7 42.Qa1 g5 43.Qa7+ Kg6 44.Qb6 Rf1+ 45.Bg1 Qe6 46.Qa6 Rd1 47.Qa3 h5 48.Qb2 Rf1 49.Qa2 Kf7 50.Qa6 Rd1 51.Qa4 Rc1 52.Qa3 Rc2 53.Qb3 Re2 54.Bd4 Qg6 55.Qb6 Qd6 56.Qb7+ Re7 57.Qb2 Ke8 58.Qc2 Qe6 59.Qb1 Qe4 1/2-1/2 SmallFish eval shows 0.0!
Post Reply