HIARCS Chess Forums Forum Index HIARCS Chess Forums
World Championship winning computer chess software program & downloads for chess database, analysis and play on PC, Mac and iPhone
 
 QuestionsQuestions   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in 

Kneel to Johan your King

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    HIARCS Chess Forums Forum Index -> Main Lobby / General Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author
spacious_mind
Senior Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 3263
Location: Alabama

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 2:03 pm    Post subject: Kneel to Johan your King Reply with quote

I have started this post for some King Johan tests.

SAITEK RISC 2500 V. 1.04 128K ROM & 2048K RAM



http://www.spacious-mind.com/html/risc_2500_2mb.html

Someone emailed me and asked me the other day what version King my Risc 2500 was, ooops I thought, that's embarrassing as I didn't know. So I took out my Risc which I haven't touched for over a year to check. Well by scrolling left and right with the arrow keys I quickly found out.

Mine is a 1.04, therefore obviously there has to be more than 1 version of King inside a Risc 2500. So what do you all have?

TEST GAME 1 RESULTS - 15TH CENTURY MASTERS



Saitek Risc 2500 is a very interesting computer with a lot options. It has 5 built-in styles as shown above. The above test was played on the EXPERT setting. Generally speaking most people consider the Expert/Offensive setting as the strongest setting. The above test seems to confirm this opinion. But then again here are the results of Test Game 2:

TEST GAME 2 RESULTS - THE TURK



In Test Game 2, the NORMAL setting clearly came out on top and this time the OFFENSIVE setting was clearly last. I think this nicely shows that ALL the settings are interesting and who comes out better mostly depends on the type of opponent you are playing. Which makes all these setting really interesting for human players to test their skill across a chess board on the living room table. Play a defensive opponent today, and tomorrow an aggressive opponent.

SCORE AFTER 2 TEST GAMES



NORMAL setting comes out on top after 2 test games. But this could change very quickly again and is very much dependent on the style of your opponent. Probably this is why the old pre high speed computer tests with fixed evaluated positions were suitable for some computers and not for others. A limited amount of hand picked positions by humans made it tough to find the right balance to suit every computer from the lowest skilled computer to highest skill computer. It just wasn't possible to do back then, because of a lack of suitable technology.

So in a nutshell, its time to embrace some new methods of testing as you continue to enjoy the old methods.

Well Saitek Risc 2500 v 1.04 overall did not score as well as Mephisto Montreaux's test results that Steve posted here:

http://hiarcs.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6835&start=15

Now another thing that makes Risc 2500 interesting for human players besides the 5 built-in style settings, is the ability to select the skill level of your opponent starting from NOVICE and progressing through MODERATE and STRONG to the strongest setting which is EXPERT.

This effectively gives you 20 Style settings that should be suitable for beginners to Master strength.

If this is not enough you can also turn on the EASY setting which removes the computer's ability to think on opponent's time which effectively would give you another 20 style settings under the EASY mode, making it a total of 40 style settings.

But it doesn't ender there either. Turn the HASH off and you now have 80 style settings.

And there is more! Do you want to play SELECTIVE or BRUTE FORCE? You have this option as well, which finally gives you a total of 160 Style settings to experiment with.

What a versatile computer! For curiosity's sake, I am going to stay with Risc 2500 a little while longer and test the NOVICE, MODERATE and STRONG styles as well, just to see if they are truly suitable for novice, moderate and strong players as well.

PS. The settings that I am using are EASY off, HASH on and SELECTIVE on.

So what is your version of RISC 2500?

Best regards,
_________________
Nick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mach2000
Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Nick,

I was the one who asked Very Happy I have version 1.03 and 1.04. I've heard of a version 1.02 but have never seen/gotten my hands on such a version.

Regards Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spacious_mind
Senior Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 3263
Location: Alabama

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mach2000 wrote:
Hi Nick,

I was the one who asked Very Happy I have version 1.03 and 1.04. I've heard of a version 1.02 but have never seen/gotten my hands on such a version.

Regards Mike


Hi Mike,

Yes it was you and welcome.
_________________
Nick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
spacious_mind
Senior Member


Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 3263
Location: Alabama

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had mentioned that I would try to test the other strength styles, therefore I played through game 1 under Novice/Normal setting and came to this position below:



In this position Risc plays Bxe6 taking the black pawn that's in front of the King. I thought at the time that this looked disappointing but I continued to play through the game which Risc 2500 finished under Novice/Normal setting 2033 rated score.

So I started the second test game where this position was reached.



In the above position Black's Queen played Qxc2????? With this position I decided that I have seen enough as it is pointless because the computer is not playing Novice or Beginner chess, what it is doing instead seems to be carrying out instructions to sacrifice a piece here and there.

This does not teach a Novice player anything.

best regards
_________________
Nick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet


Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 2086
Location: Santiago de Chile

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Johan is another chess programmer that retired silently without a hush. Same with C. Theron, the Tiger father, who disappeared just like that. Looks like Shredder author is gone too. Ed went for good, though still giving us some software but without ambitions to get the first place. The list is long and will only grow.
The field is over. No more commercial endeavours, exception made of our sponsor, but hey, how much time he will be on this?
Chess is not solved, but chess programming seems to be...

Fern
_________________
Festina Lente
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pr1uk
Member


Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 198
Location: Strood, Kent. UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fernando wrote:
Johan is another chess programmer that retired silently without a hush. Same with C. Theron, the Tiger father, who disappeared just like that. Looks like Shredder author is gone too. Ed went for good, though still giving us some software but without ambitions to get the first place. The list is long and will only grow.
The field is over. No more commercial endeavours, exception made of our sponsor, but hey, how much time he will be on this?
Chess is not solved, but chess programming seems to be...

Fern


I think the dedicated chess computer years where so exciting for us and the programmers imagine being a programmer involved with a manufacturer and making a machine that can play Chess against you. Used to love my monthly magazine with chess computer tournaments and see who was winning the best programmer race. Then i used to get my leaflets from Countrywide computers here in the UK with all the latest models could never afford a new one but there was always last years being sold where people used to trade up. Todays engines don't do a lot for me and funny enough i have Shredder on my iPad never give it a thought of the programmers. Anyway i would never get any enjoyment poking a screen with my finger and calling that playing chess.

Peter
_________________
Mephisto Exclusive MMIV
Mephisto ESB II (ESB 6000 board)
RFT Chess-Master 4MHz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet


Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 2086
Location: Santiago de Chile

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, not that interesting NOt to see real pieces, real board or a machine that offer all that.
But the worst part of software is that they are too much strong.....

Fern
_________________
Festina Lente
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Harvey Williamson
Site Admin


Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 5969
Full Name: Harvey Williamson
Location: Media City, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fernando wrote:
Johan is another chess programmer that retired silently without a hush. Same with C. Theron, the Tiger father, who disappeared just like that. Looks like Shredder author is gone too. Ed went for good, though still giving us some software but without ambitions to get the first place. The list is long and will only grow.
The field is over. No more commercial endeavours, exception made of our sponsor, but hey, how much time he will be on this?
Chess is not solved, but chess programming seems to be...

Fern


Hi Fern,

Johan is still around and will no doubt be at the next ICGA event in July. He also reads this forum! But sadly he does not post. I think the future is products like Hiarcs Chess Explorer which offer a lot more than just an engine.

Cheers,
Harvey
_________________
www.Hiarcs.com


Last edited by Harvey Williamson on Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet


Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 2086
Location: Santiago de Chile

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Harvey Williamson wrote:
Fernando wrote:
Johan is another chess programmer that retired silently without a hush. Same with C. Theron, the Tiger father, who disappeared just like that. Looks like Shredder author is gone too. Ed went for good, though still giving us some software but without ambitions to get the first place. The list is long and will only grow.
The field is over. No more commercial endeavours, exception made of our sponsor, but hey, how much time he will be on this?
Chess is not solved, but chess programming seems to be...

Fern


Hi Fern,

Johan is still around and will no doubt be at the next ICGA event in July. He also reads this forum! But sadly he does not post. I think the future is products like Hiarcs Chess Explorer which offer a lot more than just an engine.

Cheers,
Harvey


Well, then YOU guys of Hiarcs should be the people asking me about my GUI ideas that I have so many times explained to diverse programmers without any other answer than "it is too much difficult" or "in the future" or whatever.
_________________
Festina Lente
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Harvey Williamson
Site Admin


Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 5969
Full Name: Harvey Williamson
Location: Media City, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fern,

Your ideas are always welcome. Post them in a new thread in the Help/support section or email them to Mark or me.

Harvey
_________________
www.Hiarcs.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet


Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 2086
Location: Santiago de Chile

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Harvey Williamson wrote:
Fern,

Your ideas are always welcome. Post them in a new thread in the Help/support section or email them to Mark or me.

Harvey


After so many times i did that, losing time and effort explaining one by one my ideas, giving examples, etc to not avail, I lost any desire to follow suite. Fact is one and only one thing interest programmers: strength.
I cursorily talked about that in a thread that still is in CCC, I think. The more I got was the suggestion to talk to Lucas authors...

Tired regards
Fern
_________________
Festina Lente
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    HIARCS Chess Forums Forum Index -> Main Lobby / General Discussions All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP