HIARCS 14 vs Komodo 5r1 miniature

Designed for posting all types of tournaments and Games (e.g. Man vs. Machine, Computer vs. Computer and basement matches.)

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Watchman

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
User avatar
Peter Grayson
Member
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:23 pm
Location: South Wales, UK

HIARCS 14 vs Komodo 5r1 miniature

Post by Peter Grayson »

These days with the strength of chess engines it is less common to see a chess miniature between two engines, but so it was with game 5 of the Noomen 2012 test set HIARCS 14 versus Komodo 5r1 that shows even today's strong engines are capable of making "serious errors of judgement" in a game. With HIARCS 14 displaying mate in 8 by move 25 this must fall into the chess miniature category ...

[Event "Noomen2012, 5'/40+5'/40+5'/40"]
[Site "DEVO4"]
[Date "2014.01.20"]
[Round "8"]
[White "HIARCS 14 WCSC"]
[Black "Komodo 5r1 32-bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B82"]
[WhiteElo "2800"]
[BlackElo "2860"]
[Annotator "0.21;0.43"]
[PlyCount "61"]
[TimeControl "40/300:40/300:40/300"]

{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz 2833 MHz W=24.0 plies; 443kN/
s B=14.2 plies; 431kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6
6. f4 e6 7. Qf3 Qb6 8. Nb3 Qc7 9. g4 b5 10. g5 Nfd7 {Both last book move} 11.
Be3 {[%eval 21,17] [%emt 0:00:48]} b4 {[%eval 43,16] [%emt 0:00:14] (Be7)} 12.
Nb1 {[%eval 18,17] [%emt 0:00:33] (Ne2)} Qxc2 {[%eval -3,17] [%emt 0:00:15]
(e5)} 13. N1d2 {[%eval 29,17] [%emt 0:00:08]} Qc7 {[%eval 14,18] [%emt 0:00:17]
} 14. Rc1 {[%eval 42,17] [%emt 0:00:00] (Bd3)} Nc6 {[%eval 13,18] [%emt 0:00:
13]} 15. Bd3 {[%eval 38,17] [%emt 0:00:00]} Be7 {[%eval 8,17] [%emt 0:00:11]}
16. O-O {[%eval 60,17] [%emt 0:00:02]} Bb7 {[%eval 28,16] [%emt 0:00:13]} 17.
Qh3 {[%eval 54,16] [%emt 0:00:00] (Nc4)} e5 {[%eval 14,16] [%emt 0:00:14] (Qd8)
} 18. f5 {[%eval 42,14] [%emt 0:00:10] (Nc4)} a5 {[%eval 0,14] [%emt 0:00:02]}
19. Bc4 {[%eval 43,15] [%emt 0:00:08] (Nc4)} a4 {[%eval 22,14] [%emt 0:00:08]
(h6)} 20. Qh5 {[%eval 60,17] [%emt 0:00:13] (Na1)} O-O {[%eval 22,14] [%emt 0:
00:14] (Rf8) Castling into trouble! HIARCS suggested .. Rf8 looked better} 21.
Na1 {[%eval 182,14] [%emt 0:00:10]} (21. Rf3 {+2.46/17 Chosen very quickly
with cleared hash}) 21... Ba6 {[%eval 64,13] [%emt 0:00:05]} 22. Bd5 {[%eval
272,16] [%emt 0:00:04] (f6)} Bb7 {[%eval 150,13] [%emt 0:00:11] (Bxf1)} 23. Rf3
{[%eval 416,16] [%emt 0:00:08] (Nc2)} Bxg5 {[%eval 258,13] [%emt 0:00:14]} 24.
Bxg5 {[%eval 737,16] [%emt 0:00:13] (Qxg5)} a3 {[%eval 192,12] [%emt 0:00:18]
(Qb6+)} 25. Rh3 {[%eval 32752,14] [%emt 0:00:06] (b3)} h6 {[%eval 1224,11]
[%emt 0:00:04]} 26. Bxh6 {[%eval 32754,16] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 32756,
11] [%emt 0:00:10] (Qb6+)} 27. Qg6 {[%eval 32758,31] [%emt 0:00:09]} Ne8 {
[%eval 32758,15] [%emt 0:00:00] (Qb6+)} 28. Bxg7 {[%eval 32760,62] [%emt 0:00:
04] (Bg5)} Qb6+ {[%eval 32762,12] [%emt 0:00:01]} 29. Kh1 {[%eval 32762,62]
[%emt 0:00:00] (Kg2)} Qg1+ {[%eval 32764,12] [%emt 0:00:01]} 30. Rxg1 {[%eval
32764,62] [%emt 0:00:00] (Kxg1)} axb2 {[%eval 32766,12] [%emt 0:00:04]} 31.
Rh8# {[%eval 32766,62] [%emt 0:00:00]} 1-0
RadioSmall
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:12 pm

Re: HIARCS 14 vs Komodo 5r1 miniature

Post by RadioSmall »

Peter Grayson wrote:These days with the strength of chess engines it is less common to see a chess miniature between two engines, but so it was with game 5 of the Noomen 2012 test set HIARCS 14 versus Komodo 5r1 that shows even today's strong engines are capable of making "serious errors of judgement" in a game. With HIARCS 14 displaying mate in 8 by move 25 this must fall into the chess miniature category ...

[Event "Noomen2012, 5'/40+5'/40+5'/40"]
[Site "DEVO4"]
[Date "2014.01.20"]
[Round "8"]
[White "HIARCS 14 WCSC"]
[Black "Komodo 5r1 32-bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B82"]
[WhiteElo "2800"]
[BlackElo "2860"]
[Annotator "0.21;0.43"]
[PlyCount "61"]
[TimeControl "40/300:40/300:40/300"]

{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz 2833 MHz W=24.0 plies; 443kN/
s B=14.2 plies; 431kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6
6. f4 e6 7. Qf3 Qb6 8. Nb3 Qc7 9. g4 b5 10. g5 Nfd7 {Both last book move} 11.
Be3 {[%eval 21,17] [%emt 0:00:48]} b4 {[%eval 43,16] [%emt 0:00:14] (Be7)} 12.
Nb1 {[%eval 18,17] [%emt 0:00:33] (Ne2)} Qxc2 {[%eval -3,17] [%emt 0:00:15]
(e5)} 13. N1d2 {[%eval 29,17] [%emt 0:00:08]} Qc7 {[%eval 14,18] [%emt 0:00:17]
} 14. Rc1 {[%eval 42,17] [%emt 0:00:00] (Bd3)} Nc6 {[%eval 13,18] [%emt 0:00:
13]} 15. Bd3 {[%eval 38,17] [%emt 0:00:00]} Be7 {[%eval 8,17] [%emt 0:00:11]}
16. O-O {[%eval 60,17] [%emt 0:00:02]} Bb7 {[%eval 28,16] [%emt 0:00:13]} 17.
Qh3 {[%eval 54,16] [%emt 0:00:00] (Nc4)} e5 {[%eval 14,16] [%emt 0:00:14] (Qd8)
} 18. f5 {[%eval 42,14] [%emt 0:00:10] (Nc4)} a5 {[%eval 0,14] [%emt 0:00:02]}
19. Bc4 {[%eval 43,15] [%emt 0:00:08] (Nc4)} a4 {[%eval 22,14] [%emt 0:00:08]
(h6)} 20. Qh5 {[%eval 60,17] [%emt 0:00:13] (Na1)} O-O {[%eval 22,14] [%emt 0:
00:14] (Rf8) Castling into trouble! HIARCS suggested .. Rf8 looked better} 21.
Na1 {[%eval 182,14] [%emt 0:00:10]} (21. Rf3 {+2.46/17 Chosen very quickly
with cleared hash}) 21... Ba6 {[%eval 64,13] [%emt 0:00:05]} 22. Bd5 {[%eval
272,16] [%emt 0:00:04] (f6)} Bb7 {[%eval 150,13] [%emt 0:00:11] (Bxf1)} 23. Rf3
{[%eval 416,16] [%emt 0:00:08] (Nc2)} Bxg5 {[%eval 258,13] [%emt 0:00:14]} 24.
Bxg5 {[%eval 737,16] [%emt 0:00:13] (Qxg5)} a3 {[%eval 192,12] [%emt 0:00:18]
(Qb6+)} 25. Rh3 {[%eval 32752,14] [%emt 0:00:06] (b3)} h6 {[%eval 1224,11]
[%emt 0:00:04]} 26. Bxh6 {[%eval 32754,16] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 32756,
11] [%emt 0:00:10] (Qb6+)} 27. Qg6 {[%eval 32758,31] [%emt 0:00:09]} Ne8 {
[%eval 32758,15] [%emt 0:00:00] (Qb6+)} 28. Bxg7 {[%eval 32760,62] [%emt 0:00:
04] (Bg5)} Qb6+ {[%eval 32762,12] [%emt 0:00:01]} 29. Kh1 {[%eval 32762,62]
[%emt 0:00:00] (Kg2)} Qg1+ {[%eval 32764,12] [%emt 0:00:01]} 30. Rxg1 {[%eval
32764,62] [%emt 0:00:00] (Kxg1)} axb2 {[%eval 32766,12] [%emt 0:00:04]} 31.
Rh8# {[%eval 32766,62] [%emt 0:00:00]} 1-0
The move 20....0-0 from Komodo is a real surprise mistake given Komodo's high rating. Chessmaster 9000 from 2002 needs only 34 seconds using a single core of my 1830 Mhz computer to switch to 20......Rf8 :

Time Depth Score Positions Moves
0:02 1/8 0.13 512443 20...Rf8 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Nb6
23.Qxh7 Rxa3 24.Bb3
0:03 1/8 -0.02 1093685 20...O-O 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Rxa3
23.Nc2 Rc3 24.f6 g6
0:11 1/9 0.01 3647761 20...O-O 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Rxa3
23.Nc2 Rxe3 24.Nxe3 Qb6 25.Kf2 Nc5
0:27 1/10 0.46 8818421 20...O-O 21.Rf3 d5 22.exd5 axb3
23.dxc6 Bxc6 24.Rh3 h6 25.f6 Bxf6
26.gxf6 Nxf6
0:34 1/10 0.10 10905054 20...Rf8 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Rxa3
23.Nc2 Rc3 24.f6 gxf6 25.Qxh7 fxg5
26.Bxf7+ Kd8
1:05 2/11 0.48 19667970 20...Rf8 21.Na1 Nb6 22.f6 gxf6
23.gxf6 Bd8 24.Qxh7 Nxc4 25.Nxc4
Nd4 26.Nxe5
ChMris
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 10:25 pm

Re: HIARCS 14 vs Komodo 5r1 miniature

Post by ChMris »

RadioSmall wrote: The move 20....0-0 from Komodo is a real surprise mistake given Komodo's high rating. Chessmaster 9000 from 2002 needs only 34 seconds using a single core of my 1830 Mhz computer to switch to 20......Rf8 :

Time Depth Score Positions Moves
0:02 1/8 0.13 512443 20...Rf8 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Nb6
23.Qxh7 Rxa3 24.Bb3
0:03 1/8 -0.02 1093685 20...O-O 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Rxa3
23.Nc2 Rc3 24.f6 g6
0:11 1/9 0.01 3647761 20...O-O 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Rxa3
23.Nc2 Rxe3 24.Nxe3 Qb6 25.Kf2 Nc5
0:27 1/10 0.46 8818421 20...O-O 21.Rf3 d5 22.exd5 axb3
23.dxc6 Bxc6 24.Rh3 h6 25.f6 Bxf6
26.gxf6 Nxf6
0:34 1/10 0.10 10905054 20...Rf8 21.Na1 a3 22.bxa3 Rxa3
23.Nc2 Rc3 24.f6 gxf6 25.Qxh7 fxg5
26.Bxf7+ Kd8
1:05 2/11 0.48 19667970 20...Rf8 21.Na1 Nb6 22.f6 gxf6
23.gxf6 Bd8 24.Qxh7 Nxc4 25.Nxc4
Nd4 26.Nxe5
How about Chessmater 2000 from 1987?
Post Reply