Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP?
Moderators: Watchman, Mark Uniacke, mrudolf
-
- Member
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:48 am
- Location: Idyllwild, California
Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP?
Hi, Harv-
Any idea when we might see Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP? May? June? Thanks.
Jack
Any idea when we might see Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP? May? June? Thanks.
Jack
Jack Clark
Idyllwild, California
Idyllwild, California
-
- Member
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:48 am
- Location: Idyllwild, California
Hey, Krazyken-
Wondering if you have found any tricks to optimizing Sigma Chess HIARCS that I don't know about. I'm using the recommended settings on a MacBook Intel 2.2 GHz with 2GB RAM and showing an Elo of 2900. That seems great to me, but I'm always looking for some tweek I don't know about. Thanks.
Wondering if you have found any tricks to optimizing Sigma Chess HIARCS that I don't know about. I'm using the recommended settings on a MacBook Intel 2.2 GHz with 2GB RAM and showing an Elo of 2900. That seems great to me, but I'm always looking for some tweek I don't know about. Thanks.
Jack Clark
Idyllwild, California
Idyllwild, California
- Tord Romstad
- Member
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:07 pm
Re: Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP?
It better be some time soon. Otherwise, there's a big risk that there will soon be a free Mac chess program slightly stronger than Macintosh Hiarcs, albeit with a far buggier GUI.Jack Clark wrote:Any idea when we might see Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP? May? June? Thanks.
Tord
Olá a todos (hello all)
People should consider those points:
1) 2900 is enormous from an human point of view. My mini 1.66 Ghz, 1.25 Ram gives me 2870 and I am very happy with it.
2) Hiarcs Mac is now an UCI engine that sells with Sigma Chess as an interface. Hiarcs don't have its own interface, being it good or bad. Hiarcs may be used with any Mac UCI chess interface.
3) People expect Sigma Chess to have an update soon. Sigma Chess need it. It is still a PowerPC application that runs in my Intel Mac Mini, using Rosetta. In fact, it is now the sole applications using Rosetta on my Mac.
4) Hopefully for us Mac users, Sigma Chess will be updated soon and its new version will come with Hiarcs 12.
5) I say hopefully because Sigma Chess is at present the best UCI chess interface for Mac. Other ones don't have its database functions (up to 1.000.000 games in each database file), its options to manage chess player game statistics, customizable opening books, etc.
6) I say hopefully also because at this moment Hiarcs 11.2 is clearly the best UCI engine for Mac, not only because it is so strong, but because, and specially, it is can be set to play at any Elo rating from 1250 to 1870 (in my computer) in a way that is well adjusted and tested, and credible for each rating chosen. Also because Hiarcs 11.2 have an interesting style when played in down-rated mode.
7) For us, I presume, a nice interface for UCI and an engine nice to play down-rated is now more important that brute force, since we still want a game from now and then, and the internet, with its professional cheaters, is now less a choice to play chess. Brute force is less important for us also because, I presume few Mac users are "chess professionals", that use the computer to play at correspondence chess, that is if something like Correspondence Chess is still going on.
To finish, could the administrators of this forum, consider the chance of making a section here to discuss Mac Chess subjects? Thanks.
People should consider those points:
1) 2900 is enormous from an human point of view. My mini 1.66 Ghz, 1.25 Ram gives me 2870 and I am very happy with it.
2) Hiarcs Mac is now an UCI engine that sells with Sigma Chess as an interface. Hiarcs don't have its own interface, being it good or bad. Hiarcs may be used with any Mac UCI chess interface.
3) People expect Sigma Chess to have an update soon. Sigma Chess need it. It is still a PowerPC application that runs in my Intel Mac Mini, using Rosetta. In fact, it is now the sole applications using Rosetta on my Mac.
4) Hopefully for us Mac users, Sigma Chess will be updated soon and its new version will come with Hiarcs 12.
5) I say hopefully because Sigma Chess is at present the best UCI chess interface for Mac. Other ones don't have its database functions (up to 1.000.000 games in each database file), its options to manage chess player game statistics, customizable opening books, etc.
6) I say hopefully also because at this moment Hiarcs 11.2 is clearly the best UCI engine for Mac, not only because it is so strong, but because, and specially, it is can be set to play at any Elo rating from 1250 to 1870 (in my computer) in a way that is well adjusted and tested, and credible for each rating chosen. Also because Hiarcs 11.2 have an interesting style when played in down-rated mode.
7) For us, I presume, a nice interface for UCI and an engine nice to play down-rated is now more important that brute force, since we still want a game from now and then, and the internet, with its professional cheaters, is now less a choice to play chess. Brute force is less important for us also because, I presume few Mac users are "chess professionals", that use the computer to play at correspondence chess, that is if something like Correspondence Chess is still going on.
To finish, could the administrators of this forum, consider the chance of making a section here to discuss Mac Chess subjects? Thanks.
I don't have any secrets for tweaking Hiarcs, give it plenty of hash, always keep the learning on.
As for the best GUI to use on Mac OS X, Scid is by far the best for serious database use.
If you are into engine vs engine, Xboard is just awesome for that. It's not too difficult to set up matches between two two different computers. For example, I find Hiarcs on a 2.0Ghz DPG5 regularly beats out Hiarcs on a 2.8Ghx 8-way Intel, at fast time controls.
As for the best GUI to use on Mac OS X, Scid is by far the best for serious database use.
If you are into engine vs engine, Xboard is just awesome for that. It's not too difficult to set up matches between two two different computers. For example, I find Hiarcs on a 2.0Ghz DPG5 regularly beats out Hiarcs on a 2.8Ghx 8-way Intel, at fast time controls.
it's not too hard to get it to work.
You install X11 from Apple, it should be on your System disks.
you install fink
use fink to install scid.
and it's done
it's not double-click easy, but if you are a person that can read instructions and type a few commands at the terminal (they do include the commands needed in the instructions) it will almost certainly work.
You install X11 from Apple, it should be on your System disks.
you install fink
use fink to install scid.
and it's done
it's not double-click easy, but if you are a person that can read instructions and type a few commands at the terminal (they do include the commands needed in the instructions) it will almost certainly work.
Re: Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP?
Ahh, the suspense is building! The question remains unanswered!Jack Clark wrote:Hi, Harv-
Any idea when we might see Sigma Chess Hiarcs 12 MP? May? June? Thanks.
Jack
- Dark Horse
- Hiarcs Team Captain
- Posts: 3673
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:25 pm
- Location: from a cubicle in Bangalore
HIARCS 12 for Mac
seems I should have asked in here, I wish they release it soon! do they plan to release it at all ?
- Harvey Williamson
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 am
- Location: Media City, UK
- Contact:
Re: HIARCS 12 for Mac
I don't know when but it will happen.Dark Horse wrote:seems I should have asked in here, I wish they release it soon! do they plan to release it at all ?
- Dark Horse
- Hiarcs Team Captain
- Posts: 3673
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:25 pm
- Location: from a cubicle in Bangalore
HIARCS 12 for MAC
Thanks Harvey, if we sound impatient it is because we can't wait to get one!
- Tord Romstad
- Member
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:07 pm
I've just finished adding adjustable Elo rating to Glaurung, in the range 1000-2500. The ratings are not yet very well calibratated. At 2500, the strength seems to be slightly higher than Hiarcs 11.1 on my Mac, and at 1600, it seems to be similar to TSCP 1.81. I have not tested at other levels.martinus wrote:7) For us, I presume, a nice interface for UCI and an engine nice to play down-rated is now more important that brute force, since we still want a game from now and then, and the internet, with its professional cheaters, is now less a choice to play chess. Brute force is less important for us also because, I presume few Mac users are "chess professionals", that use the computer to play at correspondence chess, that is if something like Correspondence Chess is still going on.
I would greatly appreciate if you and/or somebody else could download the new Macintosh Glaurung I released today, and test the limited strength mode:
http://www.glaurungchess.com/Glaurung21.dmg
In the range above 2200, it plays exactly like at full strength, except that the search is slowed down. Below 2200, I try to emulate typical human tactical mistakes. I'm not sure how well it works; feedback is very welcome.
Note that limited strength doesn't work with the Glaurung 2.1 engine -- you'll have to use the more recent development version Glaurung 080517 (which is also bundled with the GUI). I think 080517 is also a bit stronger than 2.1 when playing at full strength.
That would be great.To finish, could the administrators of this forum, consider the chance of making a section here to discuss Mac Chess subjects?
Tord
Hello Tord
At this point I would say the following:
1. From 1000 to 1800 rating (the range I tested it playing some 1 minute + 8 second increment games) the program works at 7000 nodes/second. This produces a credible rating in the range 1500-1800 but its too much to play below 1500 rating.
2. At 1000 rating 7000 nodes/second is too much and it looks like playing a 1500-1700 player.
3. In the 1000 to 1200 rating some serious tactical blunders could be expected, kind of random moves, but I didn't saw any. I had to win based on positional knowledge and in tactical maneuvers that go beyond the horizon of the program.
4. I would try to cripple more the engine in the 1000-1200 range to give a player to beginners. I made Glaurung play at 1000 versus Shredder Classic 3 at 1500 and they draw a two games match 1-1.
5. I couldn't make the program beep, or make any sound, after the move. There is a way?
6. A bigger and more varied book would be better to play the engine. Small books are suited for engine vs engine matches.
Its nice to see things moving on in the mac chess scene. The Glaurung GUI development is also very good news, since we have few UCI interfaces for mac. Same for the arriving of another chess engine, now able to play games at our human level.
Best Regards.
At this point I would say the following:
1. From 1000 to 1800 rating (the range I tested it playing some 1 minute + 8 second increment games) the program works at 7000 nodes/second. This produces a credible rating in the range 1500-1800 but its too much to play below 1500 rating.
2. At 1000 rating 7000 nodes/second is too much and it looks like playing a 1500-1700 player.
3. In the 1000 to 1200 rating some serious tactical blunders could be expected, kind of random moves, but I didn't saw any. I had to win based on positional knowledge and in tactical maneuvers that go beyond the horizon of the program.
4. I would try to cripple more the engine in the 1000-1200 range to give a player to beginners. I made Glaurung play at 1000 versus Shredder Classic 3 at 1500 and they draw a two games match 1-1.
5. I couldn't make the program beep, or make any sound, after the move. There is a way?
6. A bigger and more varied book would be better to play the engine. Small books are suited for engine vs engine matches.
Its nice to see things moving on in the mac chess scene. The Glaurung GUI development is also very good news, since we have few UCI interfaces for mac. Same for the arriving of another chess engine, now able to play games at our human level.
Best Regards.