The Ultimate Challenge - Secret Discussion Thread
Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Watchman
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
- turbojuice1122
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:11 pm
A negative vote--a wonderful idea! But still it must be true that the sum of the absolute values of all votes must add up to 1. In that case, perhaps I could change my vote to 50% ...Ba7, -10% ...Be7, -40% ...Bb6Hetman wrote:Hi,
my vote would be for 6... Be7 or 6...Ba7 not for the others possibilities.
May be we shall introduce 'negative vote' either.
Rgds
Hetman
According to my database the highest rated player to ever play 6...Ba7 was GM Ulf Andersson (SWE, 2803) in a game played against Hans Marcus Elwert (GER). 6...Ba7 has been played by very good correspondence players like Thomas Raupp (GER, 2614), and Wolfgang Rohde (GER, 2556).Hetman wrote:Hi,
I am returning to my suggestion we shall check who from big ones has been playing 7.. Bb6, who 7... Ba7 ?
I do not mean computer vs computer games but human games aided or unaided directly by comp.
We shall to choose leading games.
Rgds
Hetman
I also found a couple of games where a 2500+ rated player chose 6...Bb6 (one game corr one OTB, both won by black).
I am not so sure if the Ba7 is so much better then Be7 because the Ba7 is weakning the King side.turbojuice1122 wrote:
In that case, perhaps I could change my vote to 50% ...Ba7, -10% ...Be7, -40% ...Bb6
I hope that you have found the way to compensate that. I do not know the variation so I can only hope.
Rgds
Hetman
Thanks for info. Here I have found one 'big one' U. Andersson. OTB and CC GM. I hope his opponent in the game was high rated, too.Linus wrote:
According to my database the highest rated player to ever play 6...Ba7 was GM Ulf Andersson (SWE, 2803) in a game played against Hans Marcus Elwert (GER). 6...Ba7 has been played by very good correspondence players like Thomas Raupp (GER, 2614), and Wolfgang Rohde (GER, 2556).
I also found a couple of games where a 2500+ rated player chose 6...Bb6 (one game corr one OTB, both won by black).
Rgds
Hetman
I mentioned the game of Kasparov playing black against Deep Junior, which continued 6... Ba7 7. c4 Nc6 8. Nc3 d6 9. O-O Nge7 10. Re1 O-O 11. Be3 e5 12. Nd5 a5 13. Rc1 a4 14. Bxa7 Rxa7 15. Nd2 Nd4 16. Qh5 Ne6...
I also found three games by Rublevsky (his rating at the time was 2686). He defended to draw against Svidler (2727) and Naiditsch (2574) in Dortmund 2004. Later that year he won with black against Karjakin (2591).
I found more games with a win for black after 6... Be7 (one of them in the same tournament as above, Svidler won with black against Naiditsch), but after replaying some of those games it seems that all those wins rely on some minor mistake from white (e.g. in a game won by Topalov, white traded a bishop for a pawn for better attacking options, but Topalov's accurate defense allowed him to neutralize the attacks and then use the material advantage to win). I hope at least one of us will find the lines that take advantage of a mistake by Harvey and Sebi (if they make one), but we cannot build a plan based on that. That's why I am still voting for Ba7.
I also found three games by Rublevsky (his rating at the time was 2686). He defended to draw against Svidler (2727) and Naiditsch (2574) in Dortmund 2004. Later that year he won with black against Karjakin (2591).
I found more games with a win for black after 6... Be7 (one of them in the same tournament as above, Svidler won with black against Naiditsch), but after replaying some of those games it seems that all those wins rely on some minor mistake from white (e.g. in a game won by Topalov, white traded a bishop for a pawn for better attacking options, but Topalov's accurate defense allowed him to neutralize the attacks and then use the material advantage to win). I hope at least one of us will find the lines that take advantage of a mistake by Harvey and Sebi (if they make one), but we cannot build a plan based on that. That's why I am still voting for Ba7.
I am not sure they will go with Qg4, overtond, but I agree with your suggestions in a previous post. It looks like 6... Ba7 will win this vote, so let's start thinking about these possible continuations:
Let's not cast premature votes for our 7th move, but let's discuss what lines may follow from these and why we may prefer one over the others.
Code: Select all
7. Qe2 Nc6
7. Nc3 Nc6
7. c4 Nc6
7. Qg4 Nf6
7. O-O Ne7
- Dylan Sharp
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:07 am
- Terry McCracken
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm
Hi,
I would say, I do not 'feel' that position.
Black are standing very low and has developed only one piece. White has: castled, developed 2 pieces and has the space advantage and manouvering advantage on the Kingside.
I suppose that Black play shall be based on tactics but it is could be not very reliable in cc play with computers aid.
U. Andersson has played that it is good sign, he was the positional player.
I think that games of positional players are good pattern for us.
What are Black 'pluses' ?
Rgds
Hetman
I would say, I do not 'feel' that position.
Black are standing very low and has developed only one piece. White has: castled, developed 2 pieces and has the space advantage and manouvering advantage on the Kingside.
I suppose that Black play shall be based on tactics but it is could be not very reliable in cc play with computers aid.
U. Andersson has played that it is good sign, he was the positional player.
I think that games of positional players are good pattern for us.
What are Black 'pluses' ?
Rgds
Hetman