CSS OM 2007 Group B Round 10:Hiarcs MP Paderborn vs Naum 1-0

[Christian Goralski]

[Event "OM 2007/2008 Group B"]
[Site "Maschinenraum Chessbase"]
[Date "2008.01.05"]
[Round "10"]
[White "HiarcsX Xeon 5355 2.66 GHz, HIARCS 11.95b MP Pa"]
[Black "ThomasTM Opteron 270 2 GHz, Naum 2.2"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B97"]
[PlyCount "57"]
[EventDate "2007.12.06"]
[EventType "tourn (rapid)"]
[EventRounds "8"]
[EventCountry "GER"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]

{Naum 2.2: 20.0 ply; 2,869kN/s Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 270 2009MHz,
(4 threads) HIARCS 11.95b MP Paderborn: 17.2 ply; 2.753kN/s Intel(R) Xeon(R)
CPU X5355 @ 2.66GHz 2660MHz, (8 threads)} 1. e4 {B/0 0} c5 {B/0 0} 2. Nf3 {
B/0 0} d6 {B/0 0} 3. d4 {B/0 0} cxd4 {B/0 0} 4. Nxd4 {B/0 0} Nf6 {B/0 0} 5. Nc3
{B/0 0} a6 {B/0 0} 6. Bg5 {B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 7. f4 {B/0 0} Qb6 {B/0 0} 8. Qd2 {
B/0 0} Qxb2 {B/0 0} 9. Rb1 {B/0 0} Qa3 {B/0 0} 10. e5 {B/0 0} dxe5 {B/0 0} 11.
fxe5 {B/0 0} Nfd7 {B/0 0} 12. Ne4 {B/0 0} h6 {B/0 0} 13. Bh4 {B/0 0} Qxa2 {
B/0 0} 14. Rd1 {B/0 0} Qd5 {-0.65/18 222} 15. Qe3 {B/0 0} Qxe5 {-1.23/17 105}
16. Be2 {B/0 0} Bc5 {-1.07/18 103} 17. Bg3 {B/0 0} Bxd4 {-0.83/19 100} 18. Rxd4
{B/0 0} Qa5+ {-1.24/19 98} 19. Rd2 {B/0 0} O-O {-1.01/18 187} 20. Bd6 {B/0 0}
Re8 {-0.72/19 184} 21. O-O {B/0 0} f5 {-1.11/16 88} 22. Qg3 {B/0 0} fxe4 {
0.00/19 258} 23. Qg6 {B/0 0} Rd8 {0.00/19 80} 24. Rf7 {B/0 0} Qc3 {0.00/18 196}
25. Bb4 {B/0 0} Qa1+ {0.78/18 222} 26. Rd1 {B/0 0} Qe5 {#12/17 412} 27. Rdf1 {
B/0 0} Nc5 {#11/15 59} 28. R1f6 {#11/18 215} Qa1+ {#10/10 0} 29. Bf1 {
ThomasTM,Naum 2.2 gibt auf (Lag: Av=0.31s, max=1.1s) #10/16 115} 1-0

[Harvey Williamson]

CSS Masters Update.

Result 5.5/8 We are in the next round! Place 1 in our Group

+4
=3
-1

[turbojuice1122]

How in the world does the Naum team fall into this?! This is practically the oldest book trap in the computer chess world nowadays. Playing into that line without book is like human players falling for Scholar's Mate.