Hiarcs Members vs Resurrection II Engine X - POST MOVES HERE

Designed for posting all types of tournaments and Games (e.g. Man vs. Machine, Computer vs. Computer and basement matches.)

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Watchman

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
User avatar
Terry McCracken
Senior Member
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm

Post by Terry McCracken »

Terry McCracken wrote:32. Rg4!

Going as Planned Regards,
Terry
Before you vote on the next move, look at this line and see why I'm suggesting 32. Rg4.

31. c4!..Ke6 32. Rg4!..dxc4 33. Rxg7..Rf8 34. f3..Rh8 35. Rg6+..Kd5 36. g4!..Rxh4 37. Rg5+..Ke6 38. Rh5!..Rxh5 39. gxh5..c3 40. Kd1..Kf5 41. f4!..Kf6 42. Ke2+−

Black's Rook on a8 hasn't moved and we're very active with our Rook on d4, 31. c4 wasn't to liquidate the d5 pawn if 31..Ke6 but to decoy Black into taking it!

If we want to win as quickly as possible we want to attack on the King-Side targeting the g7 pawn, we aren't going to win on the Queen-Side but on the King-Side!

It's our strong King-Side pawns which dictate our plan, so it appears best to follow that plan to the fullest, which means attack where we're strong and Black is weak! 32. Rg4! accomplishes that plan, Black is in deep trouble and must try and defend but loses in the attempt.

Remember, always play both sides of the board, we've handled the Queen-Side, with 31. c4!, now we make our power known on the King-Side! Attack the g7 pawn and support our pawn advance in the process!

Terry
User avatar
Tony Hedlund
SSDF
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: Luleå, SWE
Contact:

Post by Tony Hedlund »

32.Rg4
Tony, SSDF
User avatar
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Fernando Move

Post by Fernando »

I support Rg4 for the reasons given by Terry. We will have black king going here and there to defend as our king get better positions and even threat queen pawns in some variants. Black rook will play not much, besides we will exchange it by our own when we consider it fit to do so.

Rg4 regards
Fernando
User avatar
Terry McCracken
Senior Member
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm

Re: Fernando Move

Post by Terry McCracken »

Fernando wrote:I support Rg4 for the reasons given by Terry. We will have black king going here and there to defend as our king get better positions and even threat queen pawns in some variants. Black rook will play not much, besides we will exchange it by our own when we consider it fit to do so.

Rg4 regards
Fernando
Thank-You Fernando!

It seems the Res is going into overtime...circuits over heating no doubt :wink:

I'm preparing analysis if the Res chooses between 32..Kf7, Rg8 and Rd8.

32..dc 33. Rxg7

32..Kf7 33. cd

32..Rg8 33. Rg6+!

32..Rd8 33. Rxg7

Work in Progress; Ever Vigilant Regards,
Terry
User avatar
Terry McCracken
Senior Member
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm

Re: Fernando Move

Post by Terry McCracken »

Terry McCracken wrote:
Fernando wrote:I support Rg4 for the reasons given by Terry. We will have black king going here and there to defend as our king get better positions and even threat queen pawns in some variants. Black rook will play not much, besides we will exchange it by our own when we consider it fit to do so.

Rg4 regards
Fernando
Thank-You Fernando!

It seems the Res is going into overtime...circuits over heating no doubt :wink:

I'm preparing analysis if the Res chooses between 32..Kf7, Rg8 and Rd8.

32..dc 33. Rxg7

32..Kf7 33. cd

32..Rg8 33. Rg6+!

32..Rd8 33. Rxg7

Work in Progress; Ever Vigilant Regards,
Terry
P.S. A couple more...

32..Kf6?! 33. h5!

32..Rh8 33. Rg6+
User avatar
Steve B
Site Admin
Posts: 10146
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:02 am
Location: New York City USofA
Contact:

Re: Fernando Move

Post by Steve B »

Fernando wrote:I support Rg4 for the reasons given by Terry. We will have black king going here and there to defend as our king get better positions and even threat queen pawns in some variants. Black rook will play not much, besides we will exchange it by our own when we consider it fit to do so.

Rg4 regards
Fernando
I do not see a Team Captains 32nd move yet ..only your move
i could have posted a move yesterday
you are soon to default on time
Make your move as Captain or Resign in Disgrace
Have a Nice Day..
RES2X Operator
User avatar
Terry McCracken
Senior Member
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm

Re: Fernando Move

Post by Terry McCracken »

Steve B wrote:
Fernando wrote:I support Rg4 for the reasons given by Terry. We will have black king going here and there to defend as our king get better positions and even threat queen pawns in some variants. Black rook will play not much, besides we will exchange it by our own when we consider it fit to do so.

Rg4 regards
Fernando
I do not see a Team Captains 32nd move yet ..only your move
i could have posted a move yesterday
you are soon to default on time
Make your move as Captain or Resign in Disgrace
Have a Nice Day..
RES2X Operator
I'm waiting on you for this??

Make your move no later than 6:00 PM Standard Time or...Forfeit...Regards!

P.S. Quite honestly, I don't understand why you don't resign? As a matter of fact I thought that might have been the reason for the delay, your consideration of resignation on behalf of the Res II. Obviously I was mistaken. I hope that this doesn't become a problem, a long series of delays.
User avatar
Steve B
Site Admin
Posts: 10146
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:02 am
Location: New York City USofA
Contact:

Re: Fernando Move

Post by Steve B »

Terry McCracken wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Fernando wrote:I support Rg4 for the reasons given by Terry. We will have black king going here and there to defend as our king get better positions and even threat queen pawns in some variants. Black rook will play not much, besides we will exchange it by our own when we consider it fit to do so.

Rg4 regards
Fernando
I do not see a Team Captains 32nd move yet ..only your move
i could have posted a move yesterday
you are soon to default on time
Make your move as Captain or Resign in Disgrace
Have a Nice Day..
RES2X Operator
I'm waiting on you for this??

Make your move no later than 6:00 PM Standard Time or...Forfeit...Regards!

P.S. Quite honestly, I don't understand why you don't resign? As a matter of fact I thought that might have been the reason for the delay, your consideration of resignation on behalf of the Res II. Obviously I was mistaken. I hope that this doesn't become a problem, a long series of delays.
there is no move from the Teams Captain
show me the post from your Captains move for the 32nd move
there is a move only from Fernando .and it is labeled as Fernando ..not as the Captain
Fern has posted moves before both as just Fernando and then as the Captain for the same move
i have been replying to the Captains move and only his move since the very first move..
the team is close to time forfeit

RES2X Operator
User avatar
Fernando
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 3059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Captain Move

Post by Fernando »

I was expecting MORE candidates moves, MORE members playing his move. I try to be POLITE and wait the people.

If you are so in a hurry, well, let it be

Rg4

Politeness is superior to chess regards
Fernando
User avatar
Steve B
Site Admin
Posts: 10146
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:02 am
Location: New York City USofA
Contact:

Re: Captain Move

Post by Steve B »

Fernando wrote:I was expecting MORE candidates moves, MORE members playing his move. I try to be POLITE and wait the people.

If you are so in a hurry, well, let it be

Rg4

Politeness is superior to chess regards
Fernando

i agree
you are right
please take the full 48 hours allotted for this crucial move..
this brings you to 6:06 pm for the full 48 hours
slightly more then 3 hours from now
i will reply later

Best Regards
Steve
User avatar
Terry McCracken
Senior Member
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm

Re: Fernando Move

Post by Terry McCracken »

Steve B wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Fernando wrote:I support Rg4 for the reasons given by Terry. We will have black king going here and there to defend as our king get better positions and even threat queen pawns in some variants. Black rook will play not much, besides we will exchange it by our own when we consider it fit to do so.

Rg4 regards
Fernando
I do not see a Team Captains 32nd move yet ..only your move
i could have posted a move yesterday
you are soon to default on time
Make your move as Captain or Resign in Disgrace
Have a Nice Day..
RES2X Operator
I'm waiting on you for this??

Make your move no later than 6:00 PM Standard Time or...Forfeit...Regards!

P.S. Quite honestly, I don't understand why you don't resign? As a matter of fact I thought that might have been the reason for the delay, your consideration of resignation on behalf of the Res II. Obviously I was mistaken. I hope that this doesn't become a problem, a long series of delays.
there is no move from the Teams Captain
show me the post from your Captains move for the 32nd move
there is a move only from Fernando .and it is labeled as Fernando ..not as the Captain
Fern has posted moves before both as just Fernando and then as the Captain for the same move
i have been replying to the Captains move and only his move since the very first move..
the team is close to time forfeit

RES2X Operator

This is ridiculous! This isn't amusing anymore. You have lost, except it.
User avatar
Terry McCracken
Senior Member
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm

Re: Captain Move

Post by Terry McCracken »

Steve B wrote:
Fernando wrote:I was expecting MORE candidates moves, MORE members playing his move. I try to be POLITE and wait the people.

If you are so in a hurry, well, let it be

Rg4

Politeness is superior to chess regards
Fernando

i agree
you are right
please take the full 48 hours allotted for this crucial move..
this brings you to 6:06 pm for the full 48 hours
slightly more then 3 hours from now
i will reply later

Best Regards
Steve
32. Rg4! Just wins, it is the chosen move and it's the end of the game!

1-0 Regards...
overtond
Member
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:52 am

Post by overtond »

Seems a bit harsh? :-(
User avatar
Terry McCracken
Senior Member
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm

Post by Terry McCracken »

overtond wrote:Seems a bit harsh? :-(
It's chess.

As Nigel Short once said, "In chess you have to kill someone."
User avatar
Steve B
Site Admin
Posts: 10146
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:02 am
Location: New York City USofA
Contact:

Re: Captain Move

Post by Steve B »

Fernando wrote:I was expecting MORE candidates moves, MORE members playing his move. I try to be POLITE and wait the people.

If you are so in a hurry, well, let it be

Rg4

Politeness is superior to chess regards
Fernando
and so we shuffle the pieces back and forth..
50 move draw rule now in full swing

32..Kf7

RESIIX-LPU
Last edited by Steve B on Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply