CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (13th August 2022)

Designed for posting all types of tournaments and Games (e.g. Man vs. Machine, Computer vs. Computer and basement matches.)

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Watchman

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
Graham Banks
Full Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:38 am

CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (13th August 2022)

Post by Graham Banks »

The latest CCRL Rating Lists and Statistics are available for viewing from the following links:
http://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/4040 (40/15)
http://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/404 (40/2)
http://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/404FRC (FRC 40/2)

Please note that the three lists are often updated separately to each other. The FRC list is only updated when a new engine or engine version is being/has been tested.

The links to the various rating lists can be found just beneath the default Best Versions list (as in this screenshot). Specific 32-bit rating lists are denoted as such to the right of the default list in each category. The default lists contain the 64-bit engines.

Image

Our 40 moves in 15 minutes repeating and 40 moves in 2 minutes repeating are both adjusted to the Intel i7 4770k (3.5GHz) using the Stockfish 10 64-bit benchmark.

Be aware that in the early stages of testing, an engine's rating can often fluctuate a lot.
It is strongly advised to look at the many other rating lists available in order to get a more accurate overall picture of an engine's rating relative to others.

The inclusion or exclusion of engines in our lists should not be taken as our group making a statement about their legality or status. Where there is controversy, it is usually mentioned in the engine notes.

Thanks to all of our currently active testers (Graham, Ray, Gabor, Sergio, and Basti). Thanks also to Chessdom.com for hosting our website.

40/15 testing this week that I'm aware of will include (with live broadcast port for TLCV noted where applicable):
Live broadcasts of Gauntlets can be made available upon request.
(Web based viewer courtesy of Jay Honnold - Berserk engine author)

95th Amateur Series Division 7 Tournament (continuing 16093) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16093
95th Amateur Series Division 8 Tournament (continuing 16094) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16094
Lessons From Two Veterans Tournament (finishing Friday 16091) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16091
New Tournament (starting Friday 16091) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16091
Electrical Devastation Tournament (continuing 16092) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16092

Rebel 15.1 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (continuing) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16061
Arasan 23.4 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (continuing) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16063
Dragon 3.1 by Komodo 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (finishing Thursday) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16062
Velvet 4.0.0 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (starting Thursday) Web based viewer http://tlcv.net/16062

Dragon 3.1 by Komodo 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing)
Black Marlin 7.0 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing)
Inanis 1.1.0 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing)
Prophet 4.2 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing)
Arasan 23.4 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing)
Minic 3.24 64-bit Gauntlet (finishing Wednesday)
Caissa 0.8 64-bit Gauntlet (finishing Tuesday)
Minic 3.24 64-bit Gauntlet (finishing Wednesday)
Stockfish 060122 64-bit Gauntlet (finishing Thursday)
Avalanche 1.1.0 64-bit Gauntlet (finishing Thursday)
KnightX 3.4 64-bit Gauntlet (starting Tuesday)
Fornax 3 64-bit Gauntlet (starting Wednesday)
Ceibo 0.9 64-bit Gauntlet (starting Thursday)
Viridithas 2.4.1 64-bit Gauntlet (starting Thursday)

40/2 testing since the last update report has included (thanks to Gabor, Basti and Sergio):

Uralochka 3.37c 64-bit
Igel 3.1.0 64-bit 8CPU
StockNemo 3.0.0.2 64-bit
Inanis 1.1.0 64-bit
Seer 2.5.0 64-bit 8CPU
Nawito 22.07 64-bit
Avalanche 1.1.0 64-bit
Viridithas 2.4.0 64-bit
Dragon by Komodo 3.1 8CPU

FRC 40/2 testing since the last update report has included (thanks to Ray):

Black Marlin 7.0 64-bit (completed)
Post Reply