Search found 88 matches

by Soren Riis
Wed May 12, 2010 12:01 pm
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: Anand wins World Championship - A Team effort!
Replies: 61
Views: 26525

Congratulations! Very interesting. Do you know if some of the lines and moves played were found on your 8/16 core machine?
by Soren Riis
Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:51 pm
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: ICT 9 - Leiden 2009 - Hiarcs Wins!
Replies: 73
Views: 37109

Congratulations!
by Soren Riis
Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:50 am
Forum: HIARCS Customer Support & Announcements
Topic: How strong is this program supposed to be?
Replies: 7
Views: 2555

Re: How strong is this program supposed to be?

I am running Sigma 6.1 Lite on HIARCS 12.1MP on an Intel MacBook OS 10.4.11. I thought this program was supposed to play at Grandmaster strength but the games I have played against it have been disappointing. I just played a game and it took the computer 59 moves to mate me. I am not that strong a ...
by Soren Riis
Sat May 30, 2009 1:24 pm
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: ICT 9 - Leiden 2009 - Hiarcs Wins!
Replies: 73
Views: 37109

perhaps those involved in the use of Hyper-threading could explain how it does not breach the "Spirit" of the Core Limit rule in addition to not violating the "Letter "of the rule Very simple: The core limit rule is a restriction on hardware while the use of hyper treading is es...
by Soren Riis
Sat May 30, 2009 11:29 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: ICT 9 - Leiden 2009 - Hiarcs Wins!
Replies: 73
Views: 37109

This is not about odds, it's about the same rules being applied to everyone. By your definition then there is already a handicap since all engines do not use the same algorithms. As I said before, Rybka Cluster is not being Handicaped, it is not being allowed to play. I think Uri Blass said it best...
by Soren Riis
Sat May 30, 2009 9:45 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: ICT 9 - Leiden 2009 - Hiarcs Wins!
Replies: 73
Views: 37109

I was just applying your definition to the situation. According to each of the definitions you gave any engine that have worse odds after the rule change, has been handicapped by the new rules.

Personally I actually think the 8core rule might have handicapped Hiarcs to!
by Soren Riis
Sat May 30, 2009 9:31 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: ICT 9 - Leiden 2009 - Hiarcs Wins!
Replies: 73
Views: 37109

To "Handicap" means to place at a disadvantage. So please explain to us how any advantage or disadvantage is being imposed when everyone has to play by the same rules . I don't see any one player being singled out here, do you? I really like definition 2a . Does playing by the rules makes...
by Soren Riis
Thu May 21, 2009 8:15 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: Discussion/Votes For GM Tony Hedlund vs Headbangers Game
Replies: 1133
Views: 46816

I vote 27.-,d4
by Soren Riis
Mon May 18, 2009 9:16 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: World Computer Chess Championship 2009 - Pamplona 10-18 May
Replies: 172
Views: 72447

Though Hiarcs did not have its fair share of luck, I think Hiarcs performance was very impressively until something went wrong in the last game. Even during the last game I thought Hiarcs just was sailing though and that the issue was if it would end at a score of 7.0/9 (unshared 2nd place) or 6.5/9...
by Soren Riis
Mon May 11, 2009 8:22 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: World Computer Chess Championship 2009 - Pamplona 10-18 May
Replies: 172
Views: 72447

The players meeting just finished. In the first round Rybka is playing white against Deep Sjeng. The game is scheduled to start in one hour.

Todays games are:

Rybka vs. Deep Sjeng
Joker vs. Deep Junior
Hiarcs vs. Equinox
Pandix 2009 vs. Shredder
Jonny vs. The Baron
by Soren Riis
Tue May 05, 2009 10:24 pm
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: Discussion/Votes For GM Tony Hedlund vs Headbangers Game
Replies: 1133
Views: 46816

To me g6 just looks wrong and goes against standard chess theory. The traditional human view is that g6 is weakening the king position prematurely. The traditional view is the its usually best to postpone creating the weakness. I would definitely be very reluctant in playing 22.-,g6 I am also concer...
by Soren Riis
Tue May 05, 2009 1:18 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: Discussion/Votes For GM Tony Hedlund vs Headbangers Game
Replies: 1133
Views: 46816

Good we moved! I would have also have voted 21.-Bd8 . My main line is 22. Rg3 Bb6 23. Qxb4 Qa7 24.Bxb6 Nxb6 25. Bb5 Qa2+ 26. Kc1 and now I think 26.-Na4! holds for black. The line 26... d5 27. exd5 Nd6 28. Qxd6 Rfc8+ looks good for black but white can sacrifice the Queen with 29.Qc6 and black is wor...
by Soren Riis
Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:23 pm
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: Discussion/Votes For GM Tony Hedlund vs Headbangers Game
Replies: 1133
Views: 46816

I vote 18.-Rxa2!! From a human perspective I think the move deserves two exclamation marks. From a superficial point of view the rook sacrifice is like a lightening from a clear sky!

The most likely answer is 19.Nc1!
by Soren Riis
Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:13 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: Discussion/Votes For GM Tony Hedlund vs Headbangers Game
Replies: 1133
Views: 46816

I vote 17.-Rxa4
by Soren Riis
Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:59 am
Forum: Main Lobby / General Discussions
Topic: Discussion/Votes For GM Tony Hedlund vs Headbangers Game
Replies: 1133
Views: 46816

even if I think 15...a4 is safer for black, I vote for 15...Bxb3 too... sometimes like in bridge you have to bluff in chess too (I am confident white won't play the best moves :-)) Eros. Why do you think 15.-Bxb3 bluffing??? 15.-a4 is highly complicated and a true hair raising wilderness that not s...